Addis Ababa, August 19, 2026 (ENA) — Ethiopia urges investment-driven action in a bid to advance Kampala Agricultural Framework, Senior Advisor to the Minister of Agriculture said. According to Senior Advisor to the Minister of Agriculture Zena Habtewold, Ethiopia called for immediate, investment-driven action to translate lessons from the latest regional agricultural performance review into national policies and accelerate the rollout of the Kampala Framework. The Kampala Framework is Africa’s master plan for agriculture spanning from 2026 to 2035. Speaking at the conclusion of the two-day regional dialogue on the fifth Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) Biennial Review in Addis Ababa, the Senior Advisor emphasized that shifting to the new framework requires immediate action and boosted funding. According to Zena, the review offered a vital opportunity to assess regional agricultural performance, identify structural bottlenecks, and extract practical lessons to guide the transition from the previous Malabo commitments to the Kampala Framework. "The review highlighted the urgent need to address climate shocks, soil degradation, market fragmentation, and financing constraints while strengthening resilient agri-food systems across the region," Zena noted. He further clarified that the dialogue generated concrete recommendations to refine national domestication guidelines, harmonize indicator frameworks, and strengthen regional agricultural networks. According to Zena, Ethiopia is committed to domesticating the Kampala Framework and operationalizing its National Agri-Food Systems Investment Plan (NASIP). He further highlighted ongoing national priority initiatives, including expanded irrigated wheat production, the “Bounty of the Basket” (Yelemat Tirat) program, and integrated value-chain investments. Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) member states should refine their national strategies and mobilize the necessary resources to sustain agricultural transformation and boost food security, he urged. Echoing these priorities, Sylvia Henga, representing the Director of IGAD’s Agriculture and Environment Division, stressed that while the region shifts toward a broader agri-food systems approach, primary agricultural production must remain at the core. Henga noted that member states making progress in production must increasingly pivot toward post-harvest management, value addition, and agro-industrialization to turn higher yields into tangible economic and food security benefits. Henga emphasized that significant quantities of agricultural produce are currently lost due to food safety challenges, poor transport, and inadequate storage facilities, calling for stronger post-harvest infrastructure and cross-border food safety facilities to smooth regional trade. She further encouraged IGAD nations to leverage the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) by dismantling tariff and non-tariff barriers, thereby enabling seamless trade between surplus-producing countries and those facing food deficits. Closing her remarks, Henga emphasized that as processing and trade expand, countries must maintain rigorous food safety and quality standards to feed local populations nutritious food while satisfying export market demands. She further urged sustained regional dialogue, integration, and cooperation to tackle food insecurity, malnutrition, and food waste, particularly within fragile, conflict-affected settings.

Addis Ababa, August 19, 2026 (ENA) — Participants affirmed that the ongoing National Dialogue Conference is serving as a bridge toward sustainable peace and development by fostering consensus and ensuring a win-win outcome. The main Ethiopian National Dialogue Conference has been underway since July 15, 2026, at the Addis International Convention Center, bringing together thousands of delegates for in depth discussions on eight major agenda items. A total of 4,000 participants from Ethiopia and abroad are taking part in the conference, working toward shared understanding and national consensus. The participants told ENA that the conference is laying a strong foundation for a culture of consensus based on the supremacy of ideas. They described the conference as a platform that promotes mutual gains in efforts to build lasting peace and sustainable development. Agaredech Jemaneh, one of the participants, said the conference has brought together citizens with diverse views to engage in civilized and historic national consultations. Despite differences in perspectives, Ethiopians can reach common understanding and develop joint solutions, she said. Agaredech further elaborated that expanding the practice of dialogue will serve as a crucial bridge toward building an Ethiopia grounded in consensus, with recommendations emerging from effective listening, consultation and mutual understanding. Another participant, Fatuma Yimam, also said the Dialogue Conference is conducting inclusive and participatory discussions by organizing participants into groups of 10, 50, 250 and 500. The structured approach enables participants to freely present their ideas, consult with one another and develop solutions that promote mutual understanding, she added. Abdi Kedir, another participant, also emphasized that the Dialogue Conference is creating opportunities for citizens to listen to and understand one another. Recalling past challenges, he said Ethiopia had previously paid a heavy price due to limited opportunities for consultation and dialogue. The National Dialogue Conference is helping build common consensus through democratic processes, he said, expressing confidence that the dialogue will make a significant contribution to national unity, peace and sustainable development.

Why Ethiopia Belongs in the Arab League? By Jibril Lamo August 19, 2026 The trajectory of global diplomacy is shifting toward historic truth and economic pragmatism, exposing the futility of outdated geopolitical vetoes. For decades, Egypt has extensively leveraged the Arab League to serve its own narrow interests and geopolitical agenda. Yet, this transactional dynamic begs a fundamental question: what has the Arab world received from Egypt in return? Let us confront the uncomfortable truth. The answer is virtually nothing. Rather than consistently advancing collective strength, Cairo’s policies and decades of authoritarian rule have, critics argue, contributed to instability across the region—weakening Sudan’s sovereignty while pursuing policies that have fueled tensions in East Africa and the Red Sea. These regions are not peripheral to Arab interests; they are strategically indispensable to the Arab world’s security, maritime trade, energy supplies and food security. One of the most consequential examples of Egypt’s divisive regional approach is its historical involvement in the Eritrean question and the broader struggle over Ethiopia’s territorial integrity. Cairo was overtly supporting separatist forces and political projects intended to weaken Ethiopia and constrain its regional influence. The eventual separation of Eritrea from Ethiopia remains a defining episode in the Horn of Africa’s turbulent history and a powerful reminder of how external geopolitical calculations can reshape the destiny of nations. Historical diplomacy reveals that Egyptian politician Boutros Boutros-Ghali, who served as acting Foreign Minister before becoming UN Secretary-General, played a pivotal role in advancing the Eritrean secession project to permanently weaken Ethiopia. Furthermore, Cairo’s active destabilization of the southern Red Sea basin presents a direct threat to global maritime trade and regional security. By stoking tensions around the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait and proxying armed factions, Cairo has transformed vital maritime passages into arenas of geopolitical confrontation, jeopardizing the broader security architecture essential for the energy and food logistics of the entire Arab world. While Egypt’s self-serving maneuvers generate regional friction, Ethiopia’s accession to the Arab League presents a transformative opportunity from which the Arab world stands to gain immensely. Under the visionary framework of the Medemer philosophy, Ethiopia possesses the diplomatic posture and inclusive vision needed to unite and integrate the Arab world far more effectively than Cairo ever could. As the undisputed diplomatic capital of Africa and the permanent headquarters of the African Union, Ethiopia brings unparalleled experience in multilateral consensus-building. Far from being a geopolitical gamble, Ethiopia’s aspiration to join the Arab League is a natural homecoming. As a Red Sea nation with a population exceeding 135 million, a booming economy, and deep civilizational ties, Ethiopia’s membership would establish an indispensable bridge between Africa and the Middle East. Ethiopia’s connection to the Middle East is built upon millennia of shared heritage, culture, and bloodlines. In academic institutions such as Harvard University, Ethiopian studies have historically resided within Oriental and Near Eastern departments, reflecting the deep historic entanglement between Habesha civilization and the Near East. The Bab-el-Mandeb Strait was never a barrier; it served as a vibrant corridor connecting commerce, culture, and communities across the Red Sea. From the reign of King Abraha to modern genetic studies confirming shared ancestry between Ethiopian and Middle Eastern populations, these foundational bonds remain undeniable. Linguistically and culturally, the structural bedrock of the Ethiopian state is Semitic. Ge'ez, the sacred classical language of Ethiopia, alongside its modern descendants Amharic and Tigrinya, belongs directly to the South Semitic branch of the Afroasiatic language family. This linguistic heritage inextricably links Habesha syntax, vocabulary, and literary traditions to classical Arabic, Aramaic, and Hebrew. The shared linguistic infrastructure between the Horn of Africa and the Arabian Peninsula offers continuous, tangible proof of a bi-directional civilizational flow. Beyond linguistics, Ethiopia holds a sacred and irreplaceable standing in the foundational history of Islam. When the companions of the Prophet Muhammad faced severe persecution in Mecca, it was to the Aksumite Kingdom that they fled for survival. The First Hijrah to Habesha, where the righteous Emperor Najashi extended royal dignity and sanctuary to the early Muslim community, saved the Islamic faith at its inception. This deep spiritual intertwining makes Ethiopia’s cultural identity inseparable from the broader Near East. Despite these undeniable facts, Cairo has systematically weaponized the Arab League as an instrument of institutional containment against Addis Ababa. For generations, Egyptian foreign policy has operated on an obsolete zero-sum doctrine that views any Ethiopian sovereign progress—whether the construction of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam or the reclamation of direct maritime access—as a threat. By projecting its own hydropolitics onto the entire Arab bloc, Egypt has forced the League into a posture of artificial hostility toward its most powerful neighbor. In contrast to Cairo's policy of exclusion, contemporary realities demand total integration. Under the guiding principle of Medemer, Ethiopia offers the Arab world structural advantages that far surpass outdated rivalries. With an expanding industrial base and immense green energy capacity, Ethiopia serves as the primary stability anchor for the Horn of Africa and the Red Sea basin. While much of the Middle East faces severe water scarcity, desertification, and vulnerable food supply chains, Ethiopia’s highland ecology and abundant freshwater resources position it to become a vital agro-industrial partner for the entire Arabian Peninsula. Integrating Ethiopia into the Arab League transforms the Red Sea into a prosperous economic zone driven by Arab capital paired with Ethiopian land, energy, and labor scale. The League of Arab States must transcend twentieth-century nationalisms and embrace the civilizational reality of the Red Sea basin. Existing member states like Djibouti, Somalia, the Comoros, and Mauritania demonstrate the bloc's capacity to accommodate diverse regional realities. Full membership for Ethiopia does not diminish its proud African identity; rather, it elevates Ethiopia to its rightful role as the primary bridge connecting the African continent to the Middle East. It is time for the Arab League to move past Egyptian gatekeeping, leverage Ethiopia’s unifying synergy, and grant Addis Ababa its full and rightful seat.

Addis Ababa, August 19, 2026 (ENA) —Sudanese international water expert and former Minister of Water Resources, Prof. Seif al-Din Hamad, said Ethiopia’s planned additional cascading dams on the Abay (Blue Nile) River would not pose a threat to downstream countries. Speaking on the “Muqran al-Nilain” program aired by Al-Nilain News Channel, Prof. Hamad said the central it only matters their filling and operation are managed through effective coordination among the Nile Basin states. He stressed that cascade dam systems, when properly designed and managed, can contribute to regulating river flows, reducing flood risks and providing more predictable water supplies to downstream countries. According to the former minister, international experience demonstrates that a series of dams operated as an integrated system can help manage variations in seasonal flows and improve the reliability of water resources. “The main concern is not the existence of new dams but rather how we manage the initial filling and coordinate our efforts,” Prof. Hamad said. He argued that properly coordinated cascade dams could create significant benefits for Sudan by moderating the highly seasonal flows of the Blue Nile. Rather than receiving exceptionally high volumes of water during the rainy season followed by substantially lower flows, Sudan could benefit from a more regulated supply throughout the year. The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), he said, has already demonstrated the potential for such changes in flow patterns, creating opportunities that Sudan could harness for agriculture, hydropower and river transportation. Prof. Hamad said more predictable water flows could enable Sudan to improve the performance of existing hydropower facilities, including the Roseires and Sennar dams. Upgrading turbines and improving operational efficiency, he noted, could allow Sudan to generate more electricity while making better use of available water resources. He also highlighted potential benefits for Sudan’s agricultural sector, particularly through reduced pumping costs resulting from more stable river levels. According to Prof. Hamad, raising the river level by one meter during the summer could reduce agricultural pumping costs by around 30 percent, while a two-meter increase could cut costs by approximately half. He further dismissed concerns over the structural safety of the GERD and related infrastructure, pointing to the geological characteristics of the dam site and the engineering assessments underpinning its construction. Prof. Hamad said the GERD site is located roughly 600 kilometers from seismic fault lines associated with the East African Rift and is founded on solid granite with substantial load-bearing capacity. He also said engineering assessments have confirmed the structural soundness of Sudan’s Roseires Dam and its ability to safely accommodate regulated water flows. Beyond technical considerations, Prof. Hamad called on Sudan to adopt a more strategic and institutional approach to managing its water resources. He argued that uncertainty surrounding Nile water management should be replaced by stronger technical cooperation, data sharing and coordinated planning among the three countries. His assessment offers a different perspective on Ethiopia’s plans to expand hydropower generation, suggesting that additional dams need not be viewed solely through the lens of downstream risk. With effective coordination, he said, a more regulated Blue Nile could create opportunities for greater water security, expanded electricity generation, more efficient agriculture and improved regional economic integration. The broader lesson, Prof. Hamad emphasized, is that the Nile Basin’s future depends not simply on the infrastructure built along the river, but on how effectively the countries sharing its waters cooperate to manage it.

Addis Ababa, August 19, 2026 (ENA) —Egypt must abandon its long-standing posture of seeking exclusive control over Abay (the Nile) waters and recognize Ethiopia’s natural rights as the source of 86 percent of the river’s total volume, according to the geopolitician Elias Abiy. In an exclusive interview with ENA, Elias Abi, an expert in geopolitics and writer, highlighted that 135 million Ethiopians rely on these vital resources for their livelihoods and national development. The analyst stressed that Cairo’s persistent attempts to block Ethiopian water utilization disregard both geographic reality and the principles of equitable water sharing.   Cairo’s reluctance to engage in fair water sharing stems from an outdated approach that views the Nile through a lens of exclusive entitlement, he elaborated. Despite Ethiopia generating the vast majority of the river’s volume through the Abay, Baro-Akobo, and Tekezé basins, Egypt has historically sought to restrict Ethiopian development initiatives, leveraging regional geopolitical tensions and international pressure to hinder hydro-development projects. According to the expert, this obstructive approach has long ignored the clear environmental and technical advantages of Ethiopian water infrastructure. Storing water in the deep, cool valleys of the Ethiopian highlands drastically minimizes evaporation losses compared to vast desert reservoirs like Lake Nasser, which loses between 10 and 15 billion cubic meters of water annually to extreme heat.   ‘‘Look at Lake Nasser behind the Aswan Dam. It covers nearly 6,000 km² in the Sahara Desert, one of the hottest regions in the world. It loses between 10 and 15 billion cubic metres of water a year through evaporation. That’s the equivalent of the entire flow of the Baro-Akobo into the White Nile. And with global warming, this evaporation is increasing even further.” Addressing the nation's strategic forward path, Elias emphasized that internal strength, rapid economic progress and national cohesion remain Ethiopia's most effective answers to external resistance. Accelerating comprehensive development and fostering open national dialogue naturally solidify stability, ensuring that a prosperous Ethiopia can serve as a dependable anchor for broader economic integration and peace across the Horn of Africa.

Addis Ababa, August 18, 2026 (ENA) — Founder of the former Tigray People's Liberation Front (TPLF), Aregawi Berhe, said the only option left for the leadership of the illegal TPLF is to surrender to the federal government before it is too late. Founder of the now defunct TPLF, Aregawi Berhe, told ENA that Ethiopia is a strong nation with a history of overcoming every challenge it faces with victory. In this regard, he noted that the illegal TPLF's past attempts to destabilize Ethiopia as a proxy for foreign powers have completely failed. He further explained that its current efforts to continue with this similar destructive agenda will also fail entirely and lead nowhere. Describing Shaebia as "a dry piece of wood", Aregawi noted that the regime is now attempting to exploit the youth of Tigray for its evil purpose after destroying the Eritrean youth in the country. He warned that the illegal TPLF's desperate clinging to this depleted group will only end in its total destruction. Therefore, Aregawi advised leaders of the illegal group to abandon their destructive acts and surrender to the federal government. He pointed out that the federal government has been repeatedly extending a peace gesture, and many fighters have responded positively and returned to peaceful life. The founder emphasized that like the other fighters, the leadership of the illegal TPLF should also take advantage of the peace offers and seize the opportunity. When they choose the path of peace, we will play our part to ensure the federal government receives the group's leadership just as it has done for the other fighters, Aregawi said.

Addis Ababa, August 18, 2026 (ENA) —The illegal TPLF faction is exposing the youth of Tigray Region to exploitation to advance the destructive agendas of Eritrea’s regime, Shaebia and Egypt, Colonel Gebrewahid Hailu, stated. In an exclusive interview with ENA, Colonel Gebrewahid, a former Ethiopian National Defense Force officer, said the faction has subjected the people of Tigray to severe hardship while pursuing political and military objectives that serve external interests rather than the welfare of the region’s population. He identified Egypt and Shaebia as the principal forces behind the anti-Ethiopian “Tsimdo” coalition, portraying the illegal TPLF faction as an instrument carrying out the directives of external actors seeking to weaken Ethiopia. Colonel Gebrewahid further stated that the faction’s activities, conducted in alliance with domestic extremist elements and external adversaries, are aimed at destabilizing Ethiopia. According to him, the group’s actions are undermining peace and derailing development efforts. He recalled that the Pretoria Peace Agreement represented a landmark step toward ending the conflict and addressing the peace and development aspirations of the people of Tigray. However, he said the illegal faction is obstructing implementation of the agreement and seeking to impose its own authoritarian control over the region. Colonel Gebrewahid said the people of Tigray are bearing the consequences of these actions, particularly through the forced recruitment of young people for military purposes. Recalled that international organizations and human rights groups, including Human Rights Watch and the European Union, have expressed deep concern over reports of forced military conscription, child recruitment, and a coercive mobilization decree implemented by authorities in Ethiopia's Tigray region. Colonel Gebrewahid said the recruitment campaign is causing deep distress among families and mothers in Tigray. Those who oppose the practice, face arbitrary arrests, abductions and other forms of mistreatment. The former defense officer further argued that such actions violate Ethiopia’s Constitution, undermine the public interest and run counter to the spirit and objectives of the Pretoria Peace Agreement. He also drew parallels between the faction’s alleged forced recruitment practices and what he described as the longstanding coercive practices of Shaebia, saying that Eritrea’s ruling group has subjected its own population, as well as Ethiopians and Tigrayans, to repression and displacement. Shaebia is exploiting the conflict in northern Ethiopia to inflict suffering on the people of Tigray and relationship between the illegal TPLF faction and Shaebia under the “Tsimdo” banner as an alliance detrimental to the public interest, Colonel Gebrewahid underscored. He said the faction’s treatment of children and youth as instruments of war reflects a disregard for their lives, aspirations and future, arguing that young people should instead be given opportunities for education, employment and development. According to Colonel Gebrewahid, the leadership of the illegal faction continues to operate in accordance with external interests while showing little regard for the hardships faced by the people of Tigray. He said the alleged abduction and forced recruitment of young people from their families demonstrates the faction’s disregard for the welfare and rights of the region’s population. Colonel Gebrewahid said growing opposition among the people of Tigray to the faction’s actions reflects mounting rejection of what he described as a destructive political agenda. He also called for sustained efforts to free the population from coercion and restore peace, stability and accountable governance in the region.

Addis Ababa, August 17, 2026 (ENA) —Ethiopia’s efforts to transform its justice system by bringing dispute resolution closer to communities are earning international recognition, with the Hague Institute for Innovation of Law (HiiL) describing the country as “one of the leaders in transformative justice.” HiiL Chief Operating Officer, Shekhar Pula praised Ethiopia’s growing use of Community Justice Centers (CJCs) and its efforts to integrate traditional elders into the justice system. The approach could provide a more accessible, efficient and peaceful model of justice, Pula said. “Ethiopia is definitely one of the leaders in transformative justice and new ways of handling justice,” Pula told ENA that the Ministry of Justice for its commitment to alternative dispute resolution and people-centered justice. “Ethiopia is definitely at the top in those countries that are doing a very, very good job,” he said, highlighting the country’s potential to share its experience with other nations while learning from international best practices. Pula particularly praised Ethiopia’s engagement with traditional elders, citing his visit to Sidama last year during the launch of a Community Justice Center.   He said the Ministry of Justice had demonstrated respect for traditional leaders while providing guidance on how their longstanding community-based dispute resolution practices could work alongside the formal justice system. “This has promise. This can expand, this can work well for Ethiopia going forward,” Pula said, noting that the approach could help resolve disputes more quickly and contribute to a more peaceful society. The model also offers a practical solution to one of the longstanding challenges of justice delivery: distance. “It’s also a justice of proximity,” Pula said, explaining that people can access justice within their own communities instead of traveling to major cities or distant courts. He said guidelines developed for traditional leaders can further strengthen the system by promoting more consistent and informed approaches to resolving disputes while preserving the community-level advantages of traditional mechanisms. At the heart of Ethiopia’s justice reform efforts, Pula pointed to the country’s 2019 Justice Needs and Satisfaction Survey, describing it as a “lighthouse” that helped identify gaps in the justice system and provided an important foundation for people-centered reforms.   The survey, he said, demonstrated the importance of designing justice services around the actual needs and experiences of citizens. “We work in several countries, and we find that the commitment by the ministry in Ethiopia is exemplary,” Pula said. “They are really ahead and want to do a lot of the work that we’re doing together in partnership.” HiiL’s engagement with Ethiopia dates back to 2019, when it signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the then Office of the Attorney General. Since then, the organization has supported pilot Community Justice Centers in Sidama and Afar regions as well as in and Addis Ababa, aimed at connecting formal justice institutions with community-based and traditional mechanisms. The initiative reflects a broader effort to make justice not only more accessible, but also more responsive to the realities of citizens, particularly those who face geographic, financial or institutional barriers to formal courts.   By bringing justice services closer to communities and creating space for traditional institutions to contribute within a clearer framework, Ethiopia is seeking to combine established community practices with modern justice standards. The approach also comes at a significant moment for Ethiopia, as the country advances its transitional justice process and national dialogue efforts aimed at addressing longstanding grievances, strengthening social cohesion and building more peaceful mechanisms for resolving differences. For HiiL, Ethiopia’s experience offers lessons that extend beyond its borders.  

Addis Ababa, August 17, 2026 (ENA) — Participants in Ethiopia’s National Dialogue Conference are reaching common ground on the majority of issues under discussion, according to Hirut Gebre Selassie, Deputy Chief Commissioner of the Ethiopian National Dialogue Commission (ENDC). Speaking on the ongoing conference, the Deputy Chief Commissioner explained that participants initially deliberated within their respective groups before electing 15 representatives from each group to harmonize recommendations. Currently, approximately 120 representatives from eight groups are working to reconcile and consolidate the proposals developed during these extensive deliberations. She explained that the representatives are tasked with ensuring that recommendations from the eight groups contain no contradictions or duplications and are organized into a coherent and unified format. The representatives are also reviewing the decisions reached by the other groups to gain a broader understanding of their respective proposals and align the recommendations accordingly. The representatives were selected last Thursday and have been working since then to complete the harmonization process. Once finalized and refined, the consolidated recommendations will be returned to all eight groups for further review, she said. Each group will assess its own draft recommendations as well as those produced by the other groups and then members will provide input on proposals they did not directly participate in developing, with the feedback to be incorporated into the final document. The commissioner further elaborated that the eight groups bring together broad representation from across Ethiopia, including stakeholders from all woredas, with participants engaging in the process on an equal footing. She said the groups are scheduled to meet this afternoon to consolidate their work and submit feedback. The feedback will be incorporated by tomorrow, then 4,000 participants are expected to formally approve the recommendations on Wednesday. The deputy chief commissioner also acknowledged that grievances have been raised during the conference. She said the ENDC is investigating reported concerns and issuing decisions, while a dedicated committee will continue to review outstanding complaints. According to Commissioner Hirut, the committee assesses complaints and submits its findings to the Council of the Commission, which makes the final decisions. According to her, the committee evaluates complaints and presents findings to the Council of Commission, which then delivers the final rulings. She further said that while the conference is guided by the spirit of consultation and open dialogue, parties may still issue statements independently, and the Commission will respond to those as well. She emphasized that national dialogues rarely achieve complete agreement on every issue, but said the ongoing Ethiopian National Dialogue Conference has succeeded in building consensus on the majority of topics. “We are truly pleased,” she said, adding that reaching this stage provides an opportunity to express gratitude to the Ethiopian people and advance the understanding and peace the country seeks.

By Staff Writer August 16, 2026 (ENA) Ethiopia’s week unfolded around two questions that go to the heart of the country’s future. It revolved how to build consensus at home and how to secure the strategic foundations needed to sustain that future. As the National Dialogue entered a new and consequential phase, participants reached consensus across all eight thematic agenda pillars, before a harmonization team began integrating the recommendations emerging from the deliberations. At the same time, renewed discussion over Ethiopia’s quest for sovereign access to the sea brought the country’s historical, economic and strategic interests firmly back into the national conversation. Beyond these defining issues, the week also brought developments in economic reform, regional security, renewable energy, health, climate action, skills development and diplomacy—reflecting an Ethiopia seeking to strengthen its domestic foundations while expanding its role in regional and continental affairs. National Dialogue Moves From Deliberation Toward Consensus The National Dialogue remained the most significant domestic development of the week as the process moved from deliberation toward the consolidation of recommendations. Participants reached consensus across all eight thematic agenda pillars, marking an important milestone in a process intended to address major national questions through dialogue, collective deliberation and the search for common ground. The achievement ushered in a new phase. A harmonization team began integrating recommendations generated across the different thematic pillars, moving the process from individual discussions toward a more unified set of proposals. That progression is significant. The National Dialogue is no longer simply a forum for identifying differences and airing competing perspectives. Its latest phase is increasingly focused on bringing together ideas, identifying areas of convergence and preparing recommendations for the next stage. Earlier in the week, one participant described the conference as laying the foundation for a generation grounded in the supremacy of ideas. The observation captured a broader aspiration of the dialogue to strengthen a political culture in which competing views can be debated through ideas and discussion rather than confrontation. The movement from deliberation to harmonization therefore gives the National Dialogue a new character. What began as a national effort to bring Ethiopians together around difficult and long-standing questions is becoming an exercise in translating diverse perspectives into areas of common ground. For a country whose political history has often been marked by deep disagreement, consensus across all eight thematic areas carries significance beyond the conference hall. It places greater emphasis on the ability of Ethiopians to debate differences, identify shared interests and work toward common solutions. The process has also faced misinformation and negative narratives in some media spaces. The National Dialogue Commission has urged the public to approach such reports with caution and rely on verified information about the process. The next challenge will be equally important: ensuring that the consensus reached through dialogue can be translated into credible recommendations and, ultimately, meaningful outcomes. The Sea Access Question: A Strategic Interest With Historical Weight Alongside the National Dialogue, Ethiopia’s quest for sovereign access to the sea again emerged as a major strategic issue. In an exclusive interview with ENA, Gashaw Ayferam, Senior Researcher on the Horn of Africa and Water Geopolitics at the Institute of Foreign Affairs, described sovereign maritime access as a matter of profound national importance, linking it to Ethiopia’s historical trajectory, economic development and long-term strategic interests. Gashaw recalled that Ethiopia had direct access to the sea until several decades ago and highlighted the historical importance of maritime connectivity to the country’s trade and external relations, particularly during the Axumite civilization and subsequent periods. He argued that the absence of sovereign seaport access has created significant challenges for Ethiopia’s economic development, trade, investment and import-export operations, while the country’s landlocked status has also contributed to higher logistical and port-related costs. The researcher further connected maritime access to the wider security environment of the Horn of Africa, arguing that the issue extends beyond commerce to encompass broader strategic considerations. For Gashaw, Ethiopia’s pursuit of sovereign maritime access should therefore be understood as a major national interest rather than a luxury. He called for intensified diplomatic engagement based on mutual benefit, arguing that greater maritime connectivity could also support regional economic integration, continental cohesion, peace and shared prosperity. The argument places the sea-access question within a much broader strategic context. For Ethiopia, the issue intersects with history, trade, economic competitiveness, security, regional integration and the country’s long-term position in the Horn of Africa. Economic Reform Seeks Greater Inclusion and Stability The economy also featured prominently during the week as Ethiopia continued implementing reforms aimed at strengthening the financial sector, expanding economic participation and improving resilience. ENA reported that financial-sector reforms are accelerating digital banking inclusion and contributing to economic stability, highlighting the growing role of technology in widening access to financial services. The development comes alongside efforts to strengthen Ethiopia’s technical capacity in renewable energy and regional power-grid interconnection, linking financial and technological transformation with the country’s wider development ambitions. The week’s economic coverage also highlighted efforts to expand skills training in response to changing domestic and global labour-market demands. Minister of Labour and Skills Muferihat Kamil said Ethiopia is expanding skills training to respond to evolving employment requirements, underscoring the importance of preparing citizens for opportunities in an increasingly competitive and technology-driven global economy. Taken together, these developments point to an economic transformation that depends not only on capital and infrastructure, but increasingly on skills, digital inclusion, technological capacity and human capital. Regional Security Takes Center Stage in Addis Ababa Regional security was another major theme of the week. Military leaders of the Eastern Africa Standby Force was held to review regional peace and security protocols, while the 36th EASF Policy Organs Meeting opened with an emphasis on partnership, preparedness and security innovation. The meeting concluded with renewed security commitments, reinforcing the importance of collective regional mechanisms in responding to shared security challenges. The gathering came against a backdrop of conflicts, geopolitical rivalries and economic pressures contributing to an increasingly complex international and regional environment. For Eastern Africa, the discussions carry particular weight as security challenges increasingly transcend national borders. The emphasis on partnership and institutional preparedness reflects a growing recognition that regional security cannot be addressed effectively through isolated national responses. The strengthening of regional security institutions therefore remains closely connected to the wider ambitions of stability, economic integration and development across the Horn and Eastern Africa. Ethiopia Strengthens Energy and Climate Agenda Energy and environmental issues also remained central to the week’s developments. Ethiopia continued efforts to strengthen technical capacity for renewable-energy development and regional power-grid interconnection, reinforcing its broader ambition to expand clean-energy generation and deepen electricity cooperation across borders. The Green Legacy Initiative likewise remained an important component of the country’s development agenda, with a regional state administration outlining its next priorities for green development and urban renewal. International recognition of Ethiopia’s climate and urban-development efforts also featured during the week, as renowned international economists commended aspects of the country’s urban transformation and climate-resilience efforts. Diplomatic missions further reaffirmed support for Ethiopia’s sustainable-development initiatives, underscoring the growing international interest in the country’s environmental, climate and development programs. These developments reflect an increasingly interconnected agenda in which energy security, climate resilience, urban development and economic growth are being pursued as complementary rather than separate priorities. Health Cooperation Expands as Addis Ababa Prepares for Continental Forum Health was another area in which Ethiopia’s regional role continued to grow. Addis Ababa is set to host the 13th East Africa Health Federations Conference and Exhibition, bringing renewed attention to regional cooperation and private-sector engagement in the health sector. At the same time, the groundbreaking of a Fetal Diagnostic Center at St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College marked another step in expanding specialized healthcare infrastructure. Together, the developments placed both domestic healthcare capacity and regional health cooperation on the week’s agenda, linking improvements in specialized medical services with Ethiopia’s broader role in continental health affairs. A Week Defined by Consensus, Capacity and Strategic Ambition From the National Dialogue to the question of maritime access, Ethiopia’s major stories this week revolved around long-term national interests. At home, the National Dialogue moved from broad deliberations toward the difficult work of harmonizing recommendations after participants reached consensus across all eight thematic pillars. In the strategic arena, the debate over sovereign access to the sea continued to frame questions of history, economic competitiveness, security and regional integration. Meanwhile, financial-sector reform, digital inclusion, skills development, renewable energy, regional security, healthcare and climate action demonstrated the breadth of Ethiopia’s development agenda. The common thread is building national capacity—to strengthen dialogue, expand opportunity, advance technology and security, and pursue Ethiopia’s strategic interests through diplomacy and regional cooperation. As the National Dialogue enters its next phase, the central test will be whether consensus reached around the table can be translated into recommendations and outcomes capable of resonating far beyond it. And as Ethiopia continues to pursue its broader strategic interests, the week’s developments suggest that the country’s next chapter will not be shaped by a single issue. It will be shaped by how effectively Ethiopia can bring together national consensus, economic strength, institutional capacity and strategic sovereignty and turn them into a coherent foundation for a more stable, competitive and influential role in the Horn of Africa and beyond.

With analysis from Pulse of Africa (POA) Aug 16, 2026 (ENA)   By Mathias Bule Ethiopia’s alienation to its once-sovereign territory of the port of Assab has been fraught with shady deals, and complicated by the presence and involvement of colonial forces in the Horn of Africa region. Ethiopia’s quest to regain access to the sea is not merely a territorial ambition; it is a fundamental claim rooted in centuries of colonial subjugation, legal deceit, and political betrayal. The history of Ethiopia’s lost port of Assab is a stark testament to how imperial powers, through clandestine deals and manipulative treaties, deliberately and systematically deprived a sovereign nation of its maritime rights. This injustice must be recognized, rectified, and finally corrected. The modern story of it begins in 1869, when local Afar sultans sold a strip of land in Assab to Giuseppe Sapeto, representing Italy’s Società Rubattino. The deal was struck in secret, for a paltry sum of just 6,000 Italian lire—conducted entirely outside Ethiopian knowledge or approval. At the time, Ethiopia’s central government, under Emperor Menelik II, was unaware of this transaction. The sale was a clandestine act by local authorities seeking economic advantage, but it was exploited by colonial powers to establish Italy’s foothold in the Horn of Africa. Italy’s subsequent annexation of Assab in 1882 marked the beginning of a colonial empire that would dominate the region for decades. This early act of territorial theft was a clear violation of Ethiopia’s sovereignty, yet it laid the foundation for future injustices. The most infamous chapter in Ethiopia’s loss of access to the sea is the 1889 Wuchale Treaty. Drafted amidst Italy’s expansion into the region, this treaty contained a deceptive mistranslation. The Italian version declared Ethiopia a protectorate, effectively stripping it of sovereignty, while the Amharic version purportedly maintained Ethiopia’s independence. This language trickery was designed to facilitate Italian colonization. Although Ethiopia later nullified the treaty following its victory at the Battle of Adwa, Italy had already cemented control over Assab and surrounding territories through subsequent treaties in 1900, 1902, and 1908. These agreements formalized Italy’s colonial borders and made Assab a vital part of Italian Eritrea, cutting Ethiopia off from its historical coast. Post-World War II, the international community attempted to rectify colonial wrongs by dissolving Italian rule and federating Eritrea with Ethiopia under UN Resolution 390A. However, this process was, according to some political scientists and historians, marred by negligence and political expediency. During the 1950s negotiations, Ethiopian leaders failed to assert Assab’s status as an independent Ethiopian port. Instead, they treated Eritrea as a whole—along with Assab—merely as a territory to be integrated, ignoring the port’s strategic importance and its distinct ethnic and historical identity. This omission was a grave oversight, one that left Assab vulnerable to future loss. The latest blow came with the overthrow of Ethiopia’s military regime in 1991. The rebel groups that seized power—the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF/EPRDF) and the Eritrean People’s Liberation Front (EPLF)—fought as allies against colonial and imperial forces. Yet, their hasty, unlegislated decision to cede Assab to Eritrea in 1993 was a betrayal of Ethiopia’s sovereignty. The transition government, led by Meles Zenawi, acted without parliamentary ratification or public consultation. Consequently, Ethiopia was left landlocked, stripped of its sovereign access to the sea and its vital port infrastructure. This was not just a territorial loss; it was a blow to Ethiopia’s economic independence, national pride, and strategic security. Ethiopia’s historical narrative is one of resilience and sovereignty. The loss of Assab was not an inevitable fate but the result of colonial greed, diplomatic deception, and political negligence. It is time for Ethiopia to reclaim its rightful access to the sea—an essential element of its sovereignty and future prosperity. Restoring Ethiopia’s maritime rights is not only a matter of rectifying historical injustices but also a crucial step toward national dignity and economic independence. Ethiopia’s seas are its birthright, and the time has come to fight for that legacy—justice demands no less.

Addis Ababa, August 16, 2026 (ENA) —“Tsimdo”, an alliance of anti-Ethiopia groups, is a coalition of divergent political interests united mainly by opposition to the Ethiopian federal government, the Eritrean Blue Revolution Front (EBRF) Central Committee member, Dawit Teferi, said. In an exclusive Zoom interview with ENA, the Central Committee member noted that the alliance should not be understood primarily as a coalition built around a common territorial objective, but a cooperation between the alliance’s constituent groups despite their differences. “The main players in that group have nothing in common except toppling the central government in Ethiopia,” Dawit said. The alliance's immediate strategy, in his assessment, is to maintain pressure on the federal government and seek political change by bringing different groups together against it. “The goal is to continue to destabilize the government, and hopefully bring government change by creating an alliance that constantly bleeds the government out.” The Central Committee member argued that Tsimdo's strategy also depends on the Ethiopian government responding militarily in a way that could bring its members into a broader confrontation with the federal government. The the group could face greater internal contradictions if they are unable to draw the government into an open conflict, he underscored. According to him, members of the alliance are not necessarily bound by a common long-term political objective but by largely tactical cooperation. “None of them is committed to each other,” Dawit said, adding that the current cooperation is based largely on immediate strategic interests. The Ethiopian government should therefore learn from previous conflicts and avoid allowing opposing groups to determine the terms of engagement. The Central Committee member described Tsimdo as a serious development, but said he believes time and restraint could expose the alliance's internal divisions. “The longer there is no open conflict, the weight of hate between these groups will end up causing them, all of them, to eat each other,” he stressed. For Dawit, the alliance is also linked to the renewed relations between the TPLF and the Eritrean government. The relationship between the two sides is rekindled despite their longstanding rivalry and differences, he noted, adding that the rapprochement should be understood in the context of changing regional political and security calculations. The TPLF's objective extends beyond becoming a regional government in Tigray, he pointed out, saying that its goal is to regain its position as Ethiopia's ruling elite. The Central Committee member said this explains the effort to rebuild an alliance similar to the one formed in 1991 that ousted the military government in Ethiopia. However, Dawit stated that the actors involved do not appear to have taken sufficient account of the changes that have occurred over the past three decades. He observed that “they don't seem to learn from history. They want to repeat history”.

Addis Ababa, August 15, 2026 (ENA) — The quest for securing a sovereign seaport is a matter of existence aimed at reconciling Ethiopia with its glorious history of growth and civilization, Gashaw Ayferam, Senior Researcher on the Horn of Africa and Water Geopolitics at the Institute of Foreign Affairs. The senior researcher stated that Ethiopia’s pursuit of direct access to the sea is a vital existential effort to realign the nation with its historic legacy of civilization and progress. In an exclusive interview with ENA, Gashaw recalled that until three decades ago, Ethiopia possessed direct access to the sea, an asset deeply intertwined with its civilization. He explained that during the Axumite civilization and across successive historical eras, Ethiopia facilitated its international trade and foreign relations through ports and maritime access along the Red Sea corridor. The senior researcher noted that throughout history, various internal and external hostile forces conspired continuously to deprive Ethiopia of its sovereign seaport. He elaborated that by thwarting the schemes of historical adversaries, Ethiopia successfully safeguarded its rightful sovereign seaport ownership for millennia. Unfortunately, the collusion between TPLF and Shaebia unceremoniously rendered Ethiopia landlocked without any valid legal or historical justification, he elaborated. Gashaw stressed that isolating Ethiopia from the Red Sea—a body of water inextricably linked to its heritage—represented an unpardonable historical harm to the nation's core national interest. The senior researcher explained that losing sovereign seaport created severe bottlenecks for the nation's economic development, trade, investment, and import-export operations. Gashaw noted that being landlocked forces Ethiopia to incur exorbitant port rental fees and logistical expenses that strain its overall trade competitiveness. He added that lack of direct maritime access also complicates efforts to effectively counter security threats and terrorist activities across the Horn of Africa. Consequently, the senior researcher emphasized that Ethiopia's quest for sovereign seaport is not a luxury, but a paramount national interest and an existential necessity that will define the destiny of future generations. He stated that securing seaport is essential for rectifying historical distortions and reconnecting Ethiopia with its grand historical trajectory. Addressing this issue is critical to supporting Ethiopia's ongoing efforts to enhance regional economic integration and accelerate continental cohesion. He underlined that ensuring regional peace, security, and shared prosperity remains a vital national responsibility for the present generation. The senior researcher noted that Ethiopia’s pursuit of seaport is gaining international recognition, with foreign governments, global institutions, and international media increasingly recognizing its legitimacy. He recommended that diplomatic engagements grounded in the principle of mutual benefit must be further intensified. Gashaw concluded that Ethiopians across all sectors must work in unison to raise awareness regarding the issue and defend the nation’s strategic national interests.

Addis Ababa, August 14, 2026 (ENA) — The Special Operations Command is a model force for the entire military, capable of swift response to any attack and proactive threat prevention, Field Marshal Birhanu Jula said. Chief of General Staff of the Ethiopian National Defense Force, Birhanu Jula, noted that the Special Operations Command serves as a primary strategic striking force equipped with specialized military doctrine for rapid response and pre-emptive defense. The Chief of General Staff provided operational directions on current national issues to military leaders during the conclusion of the Special Operations Command's performance review for the 2018 Ethiopian fiscal year. He highlighted that during a critical period when Ethiopia faced severe trials following political changes, the Special Operations Command mounted extraordinary combat efforts to reverse imminent threats against the nation. Describing the command as a game-changing special force, the Field Marshal noted that the nation deeply honors the sacrifices made by the command and urged it to maintain its exceptional readiness for future challenges. He emphasized that the defense force has paid immense sacrifices to navigate the country through critical transitions, ensuring that their role extends beyond external defense to securing internal peace and safeguarding national existence. Field Marshal Birhanu recalled that Shaebia has historically conspired with external adversaries to deny Ethiopia sea access and undermine its strategic interests. He stated that the illegal Tigray People's Liberation Force compromised national interests during its 27-year rule, actively working to keep Ethiopia landlocked while later committing acts of treason against the national defense force. Despite repeated betrayal, Ethiopia continues its progress anchored by the dedicated defense force units like the Special Operations Command, he stressed. The Field Marshal noted that extremist elements operating under foreign agendas have formed a destructive coalition aimed at weakening the state, affirming that such ambitions are bound to fail. Birhanu added that TPLF has been pursuing divisive political tactics designed to erode trust among Ethiopians. Citizens across the country, including the people of Tigray, now fully realize the consequences of the disruptive activities of the defunct TPLF. Field Marshal Birhanu observed that TPLF is currently aligning with foreign interests alongside extremist groups like Shene and Fano, repeating past patterns of opposition to national stability. He reaffirmed that Ethiopia will press forward on its path toward growth and prosperity, frustrating the designs of historical adversaries. According to details from Defense Online Media, the Special Operations Command has attained advanced levels of armaments and human resource capacity, maintaining robust readiness to swiftly counter any aggression threatening national sovereignty.  

Addis Ababa, August 15, 2026 (ENA) — The ongoing national dialogue conference is serving as a key platform to strengthen Ethiopia’s national consensus and open a new chapter in the country’s history, participants told ENA. The National Dialogue Conference has been going on since July 15, 2026, at the Addis International Convention Center. It has brought together 4,000 participants engaged in in-depth participatory discussions on the eight major agenda pillars gathers from all over the country. Speaking to ENA, Tesfaye Dejene, one of the participants, said the dialogue is progressing well and has opened a new chapter in the country. Describing the dialogue as a historic opportunity for citizens to collectively seek solutions to long-standing issues, he added that the discussions have extensively deliberated on the agendas and came up with recommendations. Tesfaye noted that the national dialogue represents a major milestone on the path toward building a better Ethiopia. The other participant, Ibsa Ibrahim, said the conference is the first dialogue in Ethiopia’s history and will help to strengthen national consensus. For his part, Bogale Seyda said the process which is inclusive broadly involves diverse segments of the society, including farmers, pastoralists, women, youth and persons with disabilities.

Addis Ababa, August 15, 2026 (ENA) — Ethiopia’s Ambassador to the United States, Binalf Andualem and U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, Frank Garcia, held a productive meeting that focused on strengthening bilateral ties and expanding cooperation on shared strategic priorities. In a social media post, the Ethiopian Embassy in Washington DC said the two officials held wide-ranging discussions on current national and regional developments. The discussion underscored the importance of sustained engagement and close collaboration in addressing complex political, economic, and security challenges. They also explored opportunities to deepen economic cooperation, with particular emphasis on Ethiopia’s critical mining sector, which both sides identified as a key area for investment, value addition, and long-term partnership. The meeting reflected the growing momentum in Ethiopia–U.S. relations and a shared commitment to advancing mutually beneficial cooperation, promoting regional stability, and expanding economic engagement between the two countries.

Addis Ababa, August 14, 2026 (ENA) —Ethiopia’s Ambassador to Canada, Theodros Girma, underscored the importance of strengthening ties between the younger Ethiopian diaspora and their ancestral homeland as nearly 120 second-generation Ethiopians and their family members departed Canada for Addis Ababa today. The youth delegation, coordinated by former national footballer Ashenafi Girma, departed Toronto for Addis Ababa as Ambassador Theodros hailed the initiative as a major step in strengthening diaspora ties with Ethiopia’s heritage and national identity.   The group is expected to spend one month in Ethiopia, participating in cultural exchange programs, heritage visits, volunteer work, and community service activities designed to strengthen their understanding of the country and their connection to it. Ambassador Theodros said initiatives that engage second-generation Ethiopians are vital for preserving cultural identity and building enduring links between Ethiopia and its global diaspora. He recalled Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed’s repeated calls for members of the Ethiopian diaspora, particularly younger generations, to strengthen their ties with their country of origin. He noted that such programs can promote people-to-people diplomacy, encourage greater diaspora participation in national development and community initiatives, and create stronger bridges between Ethiopia and Ethiopian communities abroad.   On their part, Ashenafi Girma and members of the delegation expressed their commitment to sustaining and expanding the program, with the aim of creating long-term opportunities for young Ethiopians in the diaspora to reconnect with their roots. In its press release sent to ENA, the Ethiopian Embassy in Canada said the young Ethiopian diaspora participants are expected to engage with local communities and contribute to Ethiopia’s future development.

Addis Ababa, August 14, 2026 (ENA) — Ethiopia’s National Dialogue has entered a new phase, with recommendations developed by thematic working groups now undergoing harmonization before being presented to the main national assembly of 4,000 participants. The Ethiopian National Dialogue Commission (ENDC) announced the development on Friday, describing it as a significant step in the country’s ongoing dialogue process aimed at building consensus on key national issues. According to the Commission, the recommendations agreed upon by the working groups are now being reviewed by a 120-member harmonization team established to align, organize, and consolidate the proposals before their submission to the plenary assembly.   The team consists of 15 representatives selected from each of the eight working groups, each of which comprises about 500 participants. ENDC said the harmonization team is responsible for examining the recommendations, ensuring consistency across the proposals, and identifying any overlaps, contradictions, or gaps that may emerge from the deliberations of the different groups. The Commission said the team is currently reviewing presentations from each working group as part of the broader effort to consolidate the recommendations into a coherent national framework. Once the harmonization process is completed, the consolidated recommendations will be organized and submitted to the main assembly for consideration by the full body of dialogue participants. The latest development marks a crucial transition from thematic deliberations to the integration of proposals into a unified set of recommendations that can be debated and considered at the national level.   The dialogue reached a major milestone on Thursday when the Commission announced that participants had achieved consensus across all eight thematic agenda pillars, completing the consensus-building process on the full national dialogue agenda. The harmonization phase is expected to play a pivotal role in translating the outcomes of the working groups into a coordinated set of proposals for the next stage of Ethiopia’s National Dialogue.

Addis Ababa, August 14, 2026 (ENA) — Ethiopia and Malawi have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to strengthen cooperation in migration governance and to combat human trafficking and migrant smuggling, particularly along the Southern Route to South Africa. The agreement, signed in Addis Ababa on Friday, provides a framework for joint action in prevention, protection, prosecution, and partnership, with a focus on protecting vulnerable migrants and dismantling criminal networks. Speaking at the signing ceremony, the Minister of Women and Social Affairs, Ergoge Tesfaye, said the MOU would strengthen joint efforts by Ethiopia and Malawi to address irregular migration along the Southern Route and protect Ethiopian migrants from trafficking and exploitation. Ethiopia is a source, transit, and destination country for migrants, while Malawi serves as an important transit point along the route to South Africa, making close cooperation between the two countries essential, she said. “Migration is a natural phenomenon, but if we fail to manage it properly, we know it poses a significant danger,” Ergoge noted. She said the agreement also provides for the protection of migrants’ human rights, humanitarian assistance, and dignified return. Ergoge commended Malawi for its cooperation with Ethiopian law enforcement authorities in apprehending human trafficking suspects. She said joint efforts by the Malawian Police and the Ethiopian Federal Police had helped bring to justice individuals linked to a trafficking network that victimized more than 300 citizens. Malawi’s Minister of Homeland Security, Peter Mukhito, said the agreement would strengthen information sharing, operational cooperation, and the capacity of both countries to combat transnational organized crime. “Today, Malawi and Ethiopia are doing more than signing a Memorandum of Understanding. We are strengthening trust, closing the spaces criminals exploit,” Mukhito said. He stressed that the real test of the agreement would be its implementation, calling for faster communication, efficient information exchange, and stronger cooperation between law enforcement institutions. Mukhito also highlighted the human cost of trafficking and migrant smuggling, saying the two countries must protect vulnerable people, support victims, and ensure that traffickers do not escape justice by crossing borders. He said the agreement carries wider significance for Africa, as human trafficking, migrant smuggling, and transnational organized crime are shared challenges that require stronger cooperation among African countries. State Minister of Justice Belayihun Yirga, for his part, said the MOU provides a legal foundation for future cooperation between Ethiopia and Malawi in combating human trafficking and migrant smuggling. “We will use this as a foundation to move directly into implementation,” he said. The agreement builds on the longstanding friendship between Ethiopia and Malawi and is expected to provide a stronger framework for practical bilateral cooperation on migration management and the fight against transnational crime.

Addis Ababa, August 14, 2026 (ENA) — An Ethiopian delegation is participating in the Ministerial Session of the 36th Ordinary Meeting of the Policy Organs of the Eastern Africa Standby Force (EASF), underway in Kampala, Uganda, according to Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Ethiopian delegation, led by Major General Teshome Gemechu, Director General of Foreign Relations and Military Cooperation at the Ministry of Defense, and Etsegenet Yimenu, Ethiopia’s Ambassador to Uganda and accredited to Burundi, Seychelles and the Union of Comoros, are participating in the meeting. The meeting, being held under the theme “Building a More Secure Eastern Africa through Partnership and Innovation,” is scheduled to conclude on August 15, 2026. According to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministerial Session is considering and finalizing the deliberations and recommendations of the Chiefs of Defence Forces Meeting of EASF member states, held on August 13, 2026. The 36th EASF Policy Organs Meeting has brought together senior military leaders and other representatives from Uganda, Burundi, Comoros, Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Somalia and Sudan to deliberate on regional security priorities, strategic and operational matters, and the future readiness of the Force. The meeting is also addressing issues related to governance, resource mobilization, service regulations, operational preparedness, and the regional security situation, according to the EASF.