Addis Ababa, September 21, 2026 (ENA) — Ethiopia’s pursuit of equitable access to the sea is an imperative agenda for the country’s economic growth, national security, regional stability and integration, House of Peoples’ Representatives (HPR) member Ambassador Dina Mufti said. In an exclusive interview with ENA, Ambassador Dina said Ethiopia’s growing population and economy, coupled with evolving regional security dynamics, have made access to the sea an increasingly important national interest. He emphasized that Ethiopia is pursuing its quest for sea access through diplomatic means and seeks arrangements based on mutual benefit and respect for the interests and sovereignty of neighboring countries. According to Dina, Ethiopia’s interest in securing sea access is underpinned by historical, geographic, economic and security considerations. He noted that Ethiopia historically had access to the sea and used maritime routes for trade for many years, adding that the country’s loss of direct access to the sea has had significant economic and strategic implications. The ambassador also pointed to Ethiopia’s geographic proximity to the Red Sea as another factor underpinning its interest in securing access. He noted that some parts of Ethiopia are located relatively close to the Red Sea coastline and argued that the country has historical and legal grounds to pursue equitable access. Dina further explained that Ethiopia’s rapidly growing population and expanding economy are increasing the volume of international trade, thereby strengthening the need for diversified and reliable access to maritime routes. He said Ethiopia currently depends heavily on the Port of Djibouti for its maritime trade, noting that reliance on a single port can increase transportation costs, create logistical delays and expose the country’s trade to congestion and other disruptions. As Ethiopia’s imports and exports continue to expand, the diversification of port access has consequently become increasingly important, he added. Beyond economic considerations, Dina linked Ethiopia’s sea access agenda to regional peace and security, particularly in the Horn of Africa and the Red Sea region. He noted that the region continues to face security challenges, while piracy, human trafficking, arms and drug trafficking and other illicit activities pose risks to maritime security and international trade. According to the lawmaker, Ethiopia could make a meaningful contribution to addressing such challenges by strengthening its engagement in maritime affairs and maintaining the capacity to monitor developments that could affect its national interests and regional security. Ethiopia needs to be present in maritime areas in order to monitor developments at sea and better address issues that could affect the country, he added. Dina stressed that Ethiopia’s pursuit of sea access is being advanced through diplomacy and is not intended to undermine the sovereignty or territorial integrity of neighboring countries. “Ethiopia is not interested in hurting or invading anyone,” Dina said, stressing that the country seeks sea access through a “win-win” approach. He further said Ethiopia’s economic prosperity and development could generate benefits for neighboring countries as well, given the close economic, social and security interdependence among countries of the Horn of Africa. Ethiopia’s prosperity, growth and advancement would also be in the interest of neighboring countries, Dina said, underscoring the importance of cooperation and mutually beneficial regional integration.

Addis Ababa, September 21, 2026 (ENA) —Sudan’s warring parties should acknowledge that neither can secure an outright military victory and give negotiations a chance to end the conflict, Getachew Reda, adviser to the Ethiopian Prime Minister on East African affairs, said. Speaking to Pulse of Africa, Getachew said “Sudan deserves to be at peace,” warning that continued fighting is worsening displacement and humanitarian suffering. The war, which erupted in April 2023 between Sudan’s army and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), has devastated the country, driving millions from their homes, disrupting basic services and deepening a humanitarian crisis. The advisor said the best path forward would be for army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and RSF commander Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, widely known as Hemedti, to recognize that neither side was likely to achieve a decisive victory on the battlefield. As a result, Getachew said, millions of people have been forced to flee their homes and leave Sudan, as the conflict continues to deepen the country’s fragmentation. “Sudan has faced disintegration,” he said, pointing to the emergence of competing authorities and the division of control between the RSF and the Sudanese national army. “The best scenario is going to be for the two sides to realize that they cannot win an outright victory and to give negotiation a chance,” he said. Getachew said the conflict had also undermined what he described as a longstanding tradition of political accommodation in Sudan, where rival political figures had historically been able to coexist after changes of government. “You remove him from power. He removes you from power. But still, killing has hardly been the characteristic of the political class in Sudan,” he said. That tradition of political accommodation had been severely damaged by the current conflict, he said, describing the situation as “absolutely chaotic” and accusing both sides of contributing to the destruction of civilian areas and infrastructure. The war has also produced one of the world’s largest displacement crises. A UN report shows that since the conflict began, around 8.6 million people have been internally displaced, while about 19.5 million people are facing crisis levels of food insecurity. For Ethiopia, which shares a long border with Sudan, the conflict has wider implications, Getachew said, citing the influx of Sudanese refugees and the potential for instability in Sudan to affect Ethiopia. He warned that prolonged lawlessness could create opportunities for armed groups and other actors seeking to destabilize Ethiopia. “The elements that are given assignments to destabilize Ethiopia consider the lawlessness in Sudan a very classic environment for them to operate,” he said. Getachew also said Ethiopia should remain alert to the presence of what he described as anti-Ethiopian extremist elements within the broader Sudanese conflict. Despite those security concerns, he said Ethiopia’s interest was in seeing Sudan move toward a negotiated political settlement rather than a military victory by either side. He said any transition should ultimately be driven by civilians and smaller political forces, which he argued should come together to chart a future for Sudan. “Unfortunately, reason seems to be missing in action when it comes to the bigger players in the Sudanese conflict,” Getachew said. Since the war began in April 2023, IGAD, the African Union, the United Nations and other partners have pursued mediation efforts to end the conflict, but without a lasting breakthrough The mediators continue to stress that a sustainable solution must be Sudanese-led and owned by the Sudanese people. Despite these efforts, the war has continued and the humanitarian crisis has worsened. Last week, UN Secretary-General António Guterres issued a “mea culpa” (admission of fault) over the international community’s inadequate response, calling for greater attention to the suffering caused by the war.

Addis Ababa, September 21, 2026 (ENA) —The Chairperson of the African Union Commission, Mahmoud Ali Youssouf, and United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres have co-chaired a high-level AU–UN meeting on the margins of the 81st United Nations General Assembly to deepen strategic cooperation, strengthen peace and security frameworks, and advance global financial reforms in support of Africa. According to a social media post by the AU, the meeting reaffirmed the two institutions’ shared commitment to supporting Africa’s efforts to address structural challenges and promote a fairer international order. Key issues discussed included reform of the international financial architecture, debt sustainability, and ensuring that African countries derive greater value from their critical mineral resources. The two sides underscored the strategic importance of AU–UN cooperation, including the three existing cooperation frameworks, and the need to finalise the joint roadmap beyond 2026. The United Nations was reaffirmed as a key partner of the AU in addressing peace and security challenges on the continent. On peace and security, the meeting highlighted the need to strengthen Africa’s peace and security architecture, reinforce preventive diplomacy and mediation, and ensure adequate resources to support African-led solutions to African challenges. The discussions also reviewed developments in the Sahel, Libya, Sudan, South Sudan, Somalia, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, including continued support for the mediation led by Togo in the DRC. The meeting further expressed concern over external shocks, including conflicts, disruptions to global supply chains, and maritime chokepoints, which are placing additional pressure on African economies and food security. The potential impact of climate-related events was also highlighted. The two sides agreed on the need for concrete follow-up action, including finalising the AU–UN roadmap, planned engagements on Libya and Sudan, identifying countries most vulnerable to food insecurity, and developing contingency measures through strengthened coordination and financing.

By Staff Writer   Sept. 20, 2026 The second week of September 2026 placed Ethiopia’s strategic interests in water, maritime access, diplomacy and economic transformation firmly at the center of national and international attention. Across Ethiopian media, the Abay/Nile and Red Sea emerged as two defining themes. Discussions on the Nile focused on equitable and sustainable utilization of shared water resources and Ethiopia’s role as the source of the Abay, while the country’s long-standing quest for reliable access to the Red Sea gained fresh momentum from government officials, researchers and geopolitical commentators. At the same time, Ethiopia’s diplomatic engagement remained active, with ambassadors and senior representatives from several countries reaffirming their interest in deepening bilateral partnerships in areas ranging from agriculture and technology to green development and people-to-people relations. The week also highlighted Ethiopia’s growing engagement on global and regional platforms, from the International Atomic Energy Agency’s General Conference in Vienna to the IGAD forum on El Niño preparedness in the Horn of Africa. Together, these developments point to a broader strategic narrative: Ethiopia is increasingly linking water resources, maritime access, regional security, diplomatic partnerships and economic transformation as interconnected elements of its long-term national interests. Abay/Nile: A Debate Over Rights, Development and a Changing Basin   The Nile once again occupied a prominent place in Ethiopia’s public discourse. Getachew Reda, Minister and Advisor to the Ethiopian Prime Minister on East African Affairs, sharply criticized what he described as Egypt’s continued attempt to assert exclusive control over the Nile, arguing that such an approach is increasingly disconnected from the realities of the region. In an exclusive interview with The Pulse of Africa, Getachew said Egypt had developed what he characterized as an “artificial reality” around the Nile and argued that the river should be viewed through the realities of geography, science and the development needs of all riparian states.   Former Ethiopian House of People’s Representatives Speaker Teshome Toga similarly argued that Egypt needs to adjust its Nile strategy to the realities of the 21st century. In his an analytical article published on, Teshome pointed to population growth, climate change, rising energy demand, food insecurity and economic development as factors that have fundamentally changed the Nile Basin. He called for a framework based on cooperation, equity and mutual respect rather than what he described as outdated colonial-era assumptions. The Abay’s contribution to the Nile was also central to the discussion. According to Teshome, the Blue Nile, which originates in the Ethiopian highlands, contributes about 86 percent of the Nile’s annual flow, underscoring Ethiopia’s central geographical position in the basin.   Senior researcher Abdushakur Abdussamad, meanwhile, told ENA that what he described as the political instrumentalization of the Nile and the stereotyping of upstream countries have shaped negative perceptions in Egypt toward Nile Basin countries, particularly Ethiopia. He argued that repeated media narratives portraying the Nile as exclusively belonging to Egypt have contributed to the perception that development projects in other basin countries necessarily threaten Egypt’s water interests. The competing narratives underscore a broader challenge for the Nile Basin: how to reconcile downstream water dependence with the development aspirations and utilization rights of upstream countries through a cooperative and sustainable framework. Red Sea Access Moves to the Center of Ethiopia’s Strategic Affairs If the Nile dominated the water debate, the Red Sea increasingly dominated the maritime one. Senior Ethiopian officials, researchers and academics this week linked access to the sea with economic development, national security, regional integration and Ethiopia’s wider diplomatic role. At a panel discussion organized by the Addis Ababa Leadership Academy, participants stressed that Ethiopia’s maritime interests should be pursued through peaceful dialogue, diplomatic engagement, cooperation and mutually beneficial arrangements.   Gizachew Asrat, Chief of Staff and Senior Researcher for the Horn of Africa at IFA, said consensus around Ethiopia’s role and presence in the Red Sea is growing. He argued that Ethiopia’s expanding population, economy and trade, together with regional security considerations, make maritime access an increasingly important strategic issue. For Addis Ababa University researcher Tesfaye Jima, the issue goes beyond commercial considerations. “The Red Sea is an existential issue for Ethiopia,” he said, linking maritime access to the country’s security, sovereignty, economy and diplomatic influence. He also pointed to Ethiopia’s future import and export requirements, agricultural and fishing interests, and its broader regional engagement. The debate also received international diplomatic resonance during the week. Israeli Ambassador to Ethiopia Avraham Neguise reaffirmed Israel’s support for Ethiopia’s quest for sea access, describing stability in the Red Sea and a stronger Ethiopia as matters of broader international interest. The growing discussion therefore increasingly connects the Abay/Nile and Red Sea as two strategic questions with implications extending well beyond Ethiopia’s borders. Ethiopia on Global Platforms and Regional Preparedness Ethiopia’s international engagement was not limited to the Nile and Red Sea. In Vienna, the country participated in the 70th General Conference of the International Atomic Energy Agency, where member states are discussing nuclear safety and security, nuclear technology applications and the peaceful uses of nuclear science.   Ethiopia’s participation reflects the country’s continued engagement with global institutions on issues ranging from energy and technology to food security, environmental management and sustainable development. Closer to home, Addis Ababa hosted the IGAD Regional High-Level Forum on El Niño Preparedness for the Horn of Africa. Ethiopian Disaster Risk Management Deputy Commissioner Aydrus Hassan stressed that the potential effects of El Niño require political leadership, national ownership, regional solidarity, timely financing and early action—not simply technical preparedness.   He said Ethiopia is strengthening its disaster-risk management system around monitoring, forecasting, impact assessment, early warning, preparedness, anticipatory action and response. The country is also seeking greater national self-reliance through its Disaster Risk Response Fund. The IGAD forum similarly called for stronger contingency planning, pre-positioning of essential supplies, health surveillance, protection of food systems and expanded anticipatory action across the region. Diplomacy: Partnerships Broadening Beyond Traditional Politics Ethiopia’s diplomatic landscape also remained active, with a series of interviews with foreign diplomats highlighting the breadth of the country’s international partnerships. Ethiopia-Israel relations, according to Ambassador Avraham Neguise, extend across agriculture, health, technology, water, energy, investment and capacity building. He described the relationship as one that has evolved from deep historical ties into a broad modern partnership.   Germany and Denmark, meanwhile, highlighted cultural diplomacy, people-to-people relations, academic cooperation and green transformation as important components of their longstanding partnerships with Ethiopia. Germany’s Deputy Head of Mission Ferdinand von Weyhe emphasized that high-level political engagement needs to be complemented by direct connections between the peoples of the two countries. Denmark’s Deputy Head of Mission Mirja Crone pointed to cooperation on green transformation, bringing Danish expertise together with Ethiopian companies and professionals to promote more sustainable economic growth. The diplomatic messages came alongside New Year greetings from German, Finnish and Danish diplomatic missions, which expressed hopes for peace, prosperity and stronger relations with Ethiopia. Taken together, the engagements show diplomacy extending beyond traditional political relations into technology, agriculture, climate action, culture, education, investment and sustainable development. Economic Front: Confidence, Capacity and Reform Economic transformation formed another important layer of the week’s narrative. Former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Tibor Nagy praised Ethiopian Airlines for what he described as its strategic discipline, technical capability and operational professionalism, highlighting the carrier’s investment in training and technical capacity as key elements of its international reputation.   Ethiopian-American businessman Zemedeneh Negatu, CEO of CBE Capital Investment Bank, meanwhile argued that Ethiopia has the potential to sustain annual economic growth of between 9 and 11 percent over the coming decades, citing agriculture, manufacturing, natural resources, tourism and the country’s large young population as potential engines of growth. He particularly highlighted the transition from subsistence agriculture to mechanized and commercial production, the expansion of manufacturing and the potential for a more technology-driven economy. The economic conversation also increasingly centered on reform and investment.   International Finance Corporation Managing Director Makhtar Diop said Ethiopia had made progress in addressing constraints that previously affected private-sector investment, particularly foreign-exchange pressures, inflation and reserve levels. He also identified opportunities in digital technology, tourism, aviation, infrastructure and renewable energy. Meanwhile, Ethiopia’s focus on technology and artificial intelligence emerged as another component of its economic transformation, with Zemedeneh emphasizing digital skills, automation and the country’s young population as potential drivers of future competitiveness. A Week Defined by Strategic Convergence The week’s developments reveal a striking convergence of issues that are often discussed separately. The Abay/Nile issue is increasingly framed around development, equitable utilization and regional cooperation. The Red Sea debate connects maritime access with trade, security, sovereignty and regional integration. Diplomacy is expanding into technology, agriculture, climate action, culture and investment, while economic reform is being linked to Ethiopia’s ambition to strengthen its position in regional and global affairs. From the Nile Basin to the Red Sea, from Vienna to Addis Ababa, Ethiopia’s strategic conversation is therefore extending beyond individual disputes or diplomatic engagements toward a broader question: how can the country translate its geographic position, natural resources, economic potential and international partnerships into long-term national and regional development? That question and the competing interests surrounding it—is likely to remain central to Ethiopia’s domestic and international agenda in the weeks ahead.

Addis Ababa, September 20, 2026 (ENA) —Alula Pankhurst has commended the Ethiopian government’s diplomatic efforts to recover heritage artifacts taken from the country through looting, force, and other illicit means. Pankhurst, researcher and member of the Ethiopian National Heritage Restitution Committee, emphasized that Ethiopia has achieved encouraging results in recent years by strengthening diplomatic engagement, improving coordination among stakeholders and applying the principle of “Medemer,” or synergy, in facilitating the return of cultural heritage items. In an exclusive interview with ENA, he said numerous Ethiopian artifacts had been repatriated over the past seven years through diplomatic initiatives and coordinated efforts involving government institutions, researchers, heritage organizations and international museums.   Pankhurst emphasized that heritage objects removed through force, looting or other illicit means should be returned to their rightful historical owners. Against this backdrop, a British scholar and social development consultant said Ethiopia has intensified efforts to identify and recover heritage items that were illegally taken out of the country, including artifacts that subsequently appeared on international art and antiquities markets. According to Pankhurst, Ethiopian authorities have, in several cases, submitted formal diplomatic objections to prevent the sale of Ethiopian artifacts on foreign markets. Following the cancellation of such sales, the government and other stakeholders have engaged with the relevant parties to negotiate the return of the artifacts, in some cases through agreements involving reasonable and affordable compensation, he said.   Pankhurst also highlighted ongoing efforts to recover Emperor Tewodros II’s Gospel, which was looted from Maqdala and later put up for sale in Abu Dhabi by an Austrian firm. He said direct engagement with international museums has also become an important avenue for securing the return of Ethiopian heritage. In this regard, an agreement has been reached with the Toledo Museum of Art in the United States for the gradual repatriation of about 380 Ethiopian artifacts acquired by the museum from an individual, Pankhurst noted. Under the agreement, the museum is expected to return two 15th century manuscripts and three crosses in the near future, while the remaining artifacts will be repatriated in phases over the next five to ten years.   Pankhurst said such agreements demonstrate the importance of sustained diplomatic engagement and cooperation among government institutions, researchers, heritage organizations and international museums in restoring Ethiopia’s cultural heritage. The ongoing repatriation efforts, he added, are helping recover historical objects that constitute an important part of Ethiopia’s cultural and historical identity.

Addis Ababa, September 20, 2026 (ENA) —Ethiopia’s quest for reliable access to the Red Sea is an unavoidable national imperative,a co-founder and former Deputy Director of the East African Policy Research Institute (EAPRI), Birhanu Lenjiso said. Birhanu, author of Water: ‘Ethiopia’s Gateway to Prosperity,’ told ENA that Ethiopia’s growing population, expanding economy, and strategic position in the Horn of Africa make securing sea access an inevitable national objective. Ethiopia’s pursuit of sea access should also be viewed in the broader context of Abay/Nile, he argued that the political and strategic dynamics surrounding the two issues are closely interconnected. Speaking about Ethiopia’s historical relationship with the sea, he pointed to the Aksumite civilization, which was closely associated with maritime trade and commercial links across the Red Sea.   For Birhanu, Ethiopia’s interest in maritime access therefore extends beyond its immediate economic and logistical needs. “We are not really asking for maritime access because we need a port, or because we have a large population, or because our economy is growing,” he said. He argued that Ethiopia’s historical experience and longstanding links with maritime commerce should form part of the country’s case when engaging with the international community on access to the sea. Birhanu, who is also a former State Minister for Irrigation Development, said Ethiopia should strengthen this narrative by bringing together historical evidence with contemporary economic and strategic considerations. He described maritime access as “part and parcel of Ethiopian identity,” saying the historical dimension should not be overlooked in discussions about Ethiopia’s relationship with the Red Sea and the wider maritime environment. Against this background, Birhanu said Ethiopia’s objective is to diversify its maritime access and establish arrangements that can provide greater reliability. “All Ethiopia is asking is to have diversified access to the sea,” he said. He said Ethiopia’s large and growing market gives maritime access a broader economic dimension, while developments in the Red Sea and the Horn of Africa have made the issue increasingly significant from a regional perspective. According to Birhanu, Ethiopia’s access to the sea could generate benefits beyond the country by connecting its large economy more directly with regional maritime trade and stimulating economic activity across the Horn of Africa.   He said Ethiopia does not necessarily need to pursue a single model for maritime access, pointing instead to a range of possible arrangements with coastal states. These could include long-term lease agreements, infrastructure corridors, and jointly developed transport and logistics projects, he said. He cited Ethiopia’s longstanding use of the Djibouti corridor as an example of how cross-border infrastructure and economic interests can create mutually beneficial arrangements. At the same time, Birhanu said dependence on a single major maritime route creates vulnerabilities, making diversification important for Ethiopia’s long-term economic interests. Asked whether Ethiopia’s pursuit of maritime access is inevitable, Birhanu said the country’s demographic and economic trajectory would continue to increase the importance of securing dependable access to international maritime routes. He also linked Ethiopia’s maritime aspirations to the broader security and economic dynamics of the Horn of Africa.   The region has extensive coastlines and occupies a strategically important position along major international maritime routes, while also facing persistent security challenges, he noted. In his view, greater economic integration between Ethiopia and coastal states could contribute to trade, infrastructure development, and regional stability. He argued that Ethiopia’s large consumer market and economic potential could become an asset for coastal countries if appropriate access and infrastructure arrangements are developed. Birhanu said Ethiopia’s maritime access and its position on the Nile share what he described as a common underlying principle: equitable use of regional resources. He argued that Ethiopia’s discussions over Abay/Nile and its pursuit of access to the Red Sea should therefore not be treated as entirely separate strategic questions. “I don't really see maritime access or maritime access challenge as a separate topic. I believe it is very much connected to the Nile issue. The two waters are separate, but their politics is very much interconnected,” he said. He said Ethiopia’s approach is centered on development and equitable access rather than control over the resources of other countries.   “We are asking for equity everywhere. We are asking for development. We are not asking for domination,” Birhanu said. He maintained that Ethiopia’s maritime aspirations should ultimately be viewed within the broader objective of strengthening regional economic integration and enabling the country to participate more directly in maritime trade. “We are not looking for confrontation on Nile. We are not looking for confrontation on the Red Sea. We are looking for cooperation,” he said. Birhanu said such an approach could allow Ethiopia to advance its economic interests while creating opportunities for coastal countries and contributing to the development and security of the wider Horn of Africa and the Red Sea region.

By Gezmu Edicha Sept. 20, 2026 Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed’s participation in the 18th BRICS Summit in New Delhi was more than a routine diplomatic engagement. It was a clear moment of strategic significance for Ethiopia. In a world where influence is increasingly shaped by alliances, trade access, financial cooperation, and political positioning, Ethiopia played an active role with vision, ambition, and growing global relevance. For Ethiopia, the summit carried both symbolic and practical value. Symbolically, it reinforced the country’s place among emerging powers and reform-minded states seeking a fairer international order. Practically, it opened doors to concrete gains in trade, investment, aviation, climate diplomacy, technology transfer, and financial cooperation. These outcomes align closely with Ethiopia’s Home-Grown Economic Reform and its long-term development priorities. What made this summit important for Ethiopia was the way Prime Minister Abiy translated high-level diplomacy into tangible national benefit. Rather than treating the BRICS platform as a photo opportunity, he used it to advance specific national interests with precision and persistence. Diplomatic win on the global trade front One of the most important outcomes of the summit was the strong support Ethiopia received for its World Trade Organization accession process. According to the BRICS New Delhi Declaration, all member states expressed backing for Ethiopia’s entry into the WTO. This matters because WTO membership is a gateway to greater market access, stronger investor confidence, and deeper integration into the global economy. For Ethiopia, this endorsement carries real weight. It strengthens the country’s hand in ongoing negotiations and sends a message to the international community that Ethiopia’s reform is being recognized by influential global actors. In practical terms, this kind of support can help accelerate Ethiopia’s integration into global supply chains and improve its ability to compete under fair, rules-based trade arrangements. Just as important was the recognition of Ethiopia’s candidacy for an expanded seat on the International Civil Aviation Organization Council, which is backed by the African Union, and formally supported in the New Delhi Declaration. Ethiopia is home to Ethiopian Airlines, one of Africa’s most successful and globally respected carriers. Backing Ethiopia for this role reflects not only the country’s aviation expertise, but also its broader contribution to Africa’s air connectivity and transport leadership. Climate leadership and the road to COP32 The other major achievement is the endorsement of Ethiopia to host the 32nd United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP32) in 2027. This is a big diplomatic and reputational win. Hosting such a major global summit places Ethiopia at the center of international climate discussions and gives the country an opportunity to shape the agenda around issues that matter deeply to Africa and the developing world. Prime Minister Abiy’s vision for COP32 is rooted in practical climate action, equitable climate finance, and green development. This message therefore fits well with Ethiopia’s broader environmental agenda, especially the Green Legacy Initiative, which has become one of the country’s most visible national programs. It also builds on Ethiopia’s growing investment in renewable energy and sustainable development. If successfully delivered, COP32 in Addis Ababa could do more than showcase Ethiopia to the world. It could strengthen the country’s leadership in climate diplomacy, attract international partnerships, and highlight Ethiopia as a nation capable of hosting and shaping major global events. Financial cooperation for more resilient economic future In the financial sphere, the summit offered Ethiopia important long-term opportunities. A key focus of the BRICS financial architecture was the promotion of local-currency settlement systems and cross-border payment platforms. For Ethiopia, this is especially relevant. Like many developing economies, Ethiopia continues to face pressure from foreign exchange shortages and external currency shocks. A system that allows trade settlement in local currencies could reduce dependence on hard currency, lower transaction costs, and create more stability for importers and exporters. Trade with countries such as China, India, and Russia could become smoother and less expensive when these systems are effectively implemented. Ethiopia also advocated for faster and more predictable debt resolution mechanisms, as well as stronger liquidity support through the expansion of the Contingent Reserve Arrangement. These are not abstract financial ideas. They are practical tools that can help protect developing countries from sudden shocks and provide breathing room during periods of fiscal stress. In simple terms, Ethiopia used the summit to push for a more balanced global financial system—one that does not leave developing nations vulnerable to the decisions and pressures of richer economies. Bilateral diplomacy that opened new doors Beyond the formal plenary sessions, the summit’s sidelines proved equally valuable. Intensive bilateral meetings produced promising openings in several strategic sectors. Talks between Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi reportedly focused on critical minerals, renewable energy, and pharmaceutical manufacturing. These are all high-value sectors with the potential to support Ethiopia’s industrialization and improve national resilience. They also discussed about enhancing defence cooperation, technology transfer, capacity building, and partnership towards COP32. Engagements with Russian President Vladimir Putin were also fruitful as the leaders held constructive discussion about strengthening the strategic partnership between Ethiopia and Russia. They also explored opportunities to expand educational exchanges and deepen collaboration in cultural and people-to-people ties. These matter because Ethiopia’s development challenge is not only about capital. It is also about capability. The ability to learn, adapt, and transfer technology is essential for long-term transformation. By building these kinds of partnerships, Ethiopia is positioning itself to access expertise and innovation that can strengthen its domestic economy. Ethiopia as bridge between Africa and Global South Perhaps the most important strategic takeaway from the summit is the increasing recognition of Ethiopia as more than a national state pursuing narrow interests. It is emerging as a bridge between Africa and the Global South, between regional integration and global partnerships, and between diplomatic ambition and economic transformation. As host of the African Union headquarters and a diplomatic hub on the continent, Ethiopia occupies a unique position. It can connect African priorities with broader international conversations in ways that few countries can. This gives Ethiopia a powerful platform to advocate not only for its own development, but also for the interests of Africa as a whole. With its population of more than 135 million, vast agricultural potential, strategic location, and growing industrial ambitions, Ethiopia has real assets to bring to the table. The BRICS summit showed that it is using those assets with increasing confidence.

Addis Ababa, September 20, 2026 (ENA) —Ethiopia and the United Arab Emirates are stepping up efforts to deepen partnership in various spheres, Ethiopia’s Ambassador to the UAE, Jemal Beker told ENA. The Special Envoy and Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary highlighted the expanding partnership as the two countries accelerate cooperation in investment, tourism, trade, and other economic sectors to turn growing diplomatic ties into tangible business opportunities. He said Ethiopia’s ongoing macroeconomic reforms are helping create a more favorable environment for foreign investment by improving the investment climate, attracting international capital, and strengthening the country’s integration into the global economy. The Ethiopian Embassy in the UAE, he added, is playing an active role in promoting Ethiopia’s investment opportunities and connecting Ethiopian businesses and projects with potential international investors. Ethiopia’s abundant renewable energy resources, large and youthful workforce, strategic geographic position, and international connectivity—including through Ethiopian Airlines, are among the country’s major investment advantages, Ambassador Jemal pointed out. The embassy is leveraging international conferences, business forums, investment events, and direct engagement with the private sector to showcase these opportunities and facilitate stronger links between Ethiopian and UAE-based investors. Ambassador Jemal also highlighted the participation of an Ethiopian delegation led by President Taye Atske Selassie in the annual Global Investment Meeting in the UAE as an important platform for presenting Ethiopia’s investment potential and further strengthening economic cooperation between the two countries. Beyond investment, Ethiopia and the UAE are working to expand bilateral trade by consolidating existing markets while identifying new areas of commercial cooperation. The embassy is engaging relevant stakeholders and businesses to facilitate stronger connections and help increase trade flows between the two countries. Tourism is also emerging as another important area of bilateral cooperation. Ethiopia is seeking to attract more visitors from the UAE by promoting its rich historical and cultural heritage, diverse natural landscapes, and growing tourism destinations. Initiatives such as “Dine for Nation” are being increasingly promoted to international audiences as part of efforts to position Ethiopia as an attractive tourism destination. The two countries are also exploring greater cooperation in technology transfer, professional expertise, and technical support. Such partnerships could strengthen knowledge sharing, capacity building, and access to technologies that support Ethiopia’s broader economic transformation. Ambassador Jemal said Ethiopia will continue working with the UAE to expand trade and investment, attract more tourists, and strengthen cooperation in technology and professional expertise. The efforts, he noted, reflect the two countries’ broader push to turn their growing bilateral relationship into tangible economic opportunities for businesses and people in both countries.

Addis Ababa, September 19, 2026 (ENA) — In a sharp assessment, Getachew Reda, Minister and Advisor to the Ethiopian Prime Minister on East African Affairs, described Egypt’s claim of exclusive control over the Nile as an outdated fantasy and condemned its regional interference as both counterproductive and dangerous. In an exclusive interview with The Pulse of Africa, Getachew stated: “Egyptians are very good at creating an artificial reality.” He described Egypt’s long-standing insistence that the Nile belongs to it alone — not as a shared resource among upstream and downstream countries, but as something it owns entirely. He highlighted the audacity of this position, noting that one should not be surprised if an Egyptian claimed that Egypt itself is the source of the Nile. Getachew argued that Egypt has shown a tremendous capacity to force science to fit its preferred narrative. In politics, he said, this has produced a deep sense of entitlement that they call “historic rights,” to such an extent that it would be almost impossible for an Egyptian to believe there are people who happen to be the source of the Nile and who might have some use for it — whether for hydroelectric power, irrigation, or other purposes. Invoking the ideas of Italian philosopher Antonio Gramsci, he argued that Egypt has developed cultural, social, and historical hegemony over how the Nile is perceived by Egyptians, which he attributed to what he described as a one-sided interpretation of the river’s significance. As a result, any attempt by other riparian countries to use these water resources is deemed unacceptable. The advisor explained that the Egyptian framing of “historic rights” is simply the idea that whoever used the water first must continue to use it indefinitely. “Historic rights became obsolete because they are unacceptable,” he asserted, adding that the later concept of “water security” promoted in international circles is simply another name for the same outdated claim. He rejected the notion that the Nile issue is an existential question for Egypt, arguing that Egyptian leaders securitize the matter precisely because they wish to preserve a monopoly. “Egyptian politicians have a very complicated relationship with reality,” Getachew remarked. The minister was blunt about Egypt’s water management. Egypt has among the worst water-management practices, he argued, pointing to water-intensive projects such as the Toshka scheme, including golf courses and other developments in the desert, as examples of what he described as poor water management. He further noted that annual evaporation from the Aswan High Dam far exceeds the amount of water stored in Ethiopia’s reservoirs. Getachew stated that the Egyptian regime has systematically worked to destabilize Ethiopia — the source of the largest share of the Nile’s water — and Sudan, which holds significant irrigation potential. Instability in Sudan, he argued, serves Egypt’s interests by preventing that country from fully utilizing the river. He cited what he called a clear double standard: while the Muslim Brotherhood is banned and suppressed in Egypt, Egyptian authorities have supported Brotherhood-linked elements in Sudan. He characterized Egypt’s political maneuvering as short-sighted. Getachew was unequivocal: the best option for Egypt is to abandon its failed strategy, come to terms with Ethiopia, and work toward regional stability. A stable Ethiopia and Sudan, he stressed, would never prejudice Egypt’s legitimate interests. He argued that Ethiopia, as an upstream riparian, has every right to use its water resources, while noting: “The problem with Egypt is that it cannot come to terms with reality.” “My advice is that the reality has changed and changed forever. Trying to impose their version of science, climate science, and hydrology on upstream countries is anachronistic and counterproductive. Their heavy involvement in destabilizing activities in the region is equally counterproductive — and potentially dangerous for themselves.” Any genuine negotiation or mediation, he insisted, must bring both sides to the table and be rooted in reality and science, not politics. “Geography is stable. You cannot change geography,” Getachew stated.

Addis Ababa, September 19, 2026 (ENA) —Access to the Red Sea is an existential issue for Ethiopia, with implications for the country’s security, sovereignty, economy, and diplomatic influence, a researcher at Addis Ababa University said. Tesfaye Jima, a researcher at Addis Ababa University, made the remarks in an exclusive interview with ENA, saying Ethiopia’s interest in the Red Sea goes far beyond trade. Ethiopia’s growing population and future economic needs make access to the sea an important national concern, he said, questioning how the country can meet its future demands and sustain its influence while remaining landlocked. “The Red Sea is an existential issue for Ethiopia,” he said, noting that sea access matters for imports and exports, as well as fishing and agricultural production. Sea access would give Ethiopia greater control over its economic activities and strengthen its security and sovereignty, he said. Access to the Red Sea would also strengthen Ethiopia’s diplomatic and political engagement in the region and beyond, he said. “We need the Red Sea to project influence regionally and globally,” he said. Ethiopia’s interest in the Red Sea also has a regional dimension, he said, arguing that stronger engagement could contribute to peace, security and economic cooperation in the region. Ethiopia’s demographic and economic potential could enable it to play a greater role in regional affairs, he said, highlighting the importance of developing maritime and naval capabilities. Ethiopia’s return to the Red Sea and broader participation in regional mechanisms could benefit countries in the region by promoting cooperation in peace, security and development, he argued.   On the legal dimension, Ethiopia has signed international treaties, agreements and conventions relevant to its interests in the Red Sea and the Nile, he said. Historical agreements and records, including those dating back to the 1870s, should be studied and presented with evidence through diplomatic channels as part of Ethiopia’s efforts to explain its position and national interests, he said. Tesfaye also stressed the importance of research and public awareness, calling on scholars to conduct evidence-based studies and engage major international institutions, while the media should help the public better understand the issue. National unity and cooperation are essential in pursuing Ethiopia’s sea-access interests, he said, adding that national interests should serve the country, its people and future generations. Ethiopia should pursue its interests through peaceful diplomacy while addressing internal challenges and strengthening peace and stability at home, he said. He cited Ethiopia’s experience in advancing the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam through diplomatic engagement as an example of advancing national interests through peaceful means. Ethiopia’s sea-access agenda should therefore be treated as a long-term national issue requiring research, diplomacy, public awareness and cooperation, he said.

Addis Ababa, September 18, 2026 (ENA) — Senior Ethiopian officials have emphasized the strategic importance of access to the Red Sea, linking it to the country’s economic development, national security, regional integration and diplomatic relations with neighboring and wider international partners. The remarks were made during a panel discussion on the Nile River and sea access organized by the Addis Ababa Leadership Academy, bringing together government officials, scholars and other invited participants to examine the two issues and their implications for Ethiopia’s long term national interests. Participants stressed that Ethiopia’s interests in maritime access should be pursued through peaceful dialogue, diplomatic engagement, cooperation and arrangements based on mutual benefit. Adviser to the Prime Minister on Youth and Sports Affairs Kejela Merdasa, speaking at the opening of the discussion, said the Red Sea has long served as a major corridor for international trade and has assumed growing importance in global and regional geopolitics. Minister Kejela also highlighted Ethiopia’s historical connections with the Red Sea region, including the longstanding links between the Aksumite civilization and the Arabian Peninsula, particularly southern Yemen. Beyond its historical significance, Kejela said the Red Sea has acquired increasing geopolitical and military importance due to the strategic interests and presence of major regional and global powers. For Ethiopia, he said, access to the Red Sea has implications extending beyond maritime trade, including logistics infrastructure, economic competitiveness, energy security, national security, regional integration and diplomatic relations with the wider world. He further stressed the need to view Ethiopia’s interests in the Red Sea and the Nile as interconnected components of the country’s long term national interests. Ambassador Dina Mufti, a member of the House of Peoples’ Representatives, similarly linked Ethiopia’s interest in maritime access to its history, geography, population, economic development and security requirements. Mufti emphasized that the issue should be pursued through peaceful and diplomatic means, including dialogue, agreement, cooperation and mutual benefit. He also stressed that Ethiopia has no intention of invading another country. “Sea access is our permanent national agenda,” Mufti said. He called for sustained intellectual and public discussions on the issue, alongside stronger diplomatic engagement with neighboring countries, African states and the international community. Tasew Gebre, President of the Addis Ababa Leadership Academy, said sea access and the Nile are closely connected to Ethiopia’s future economic development, national security and regional integration. The president emphasized the importance of addressing differences through dialogue, trust, legal frameworks and shared interests, noting that the development of one country does not necessarily have to be perceived as a threat by another. According to him, the Academy seeks to bring scholarly research and ideas into public discussions and contribute to dialogue aimed at safeguarding national interests, advancing shared interests and creating opportunities for regional cooperation. The discussion highlighted the growing attention in Ethiopia to the relationship between maritime access, the Nile, economic development and regional security. Speakers emphasized diplomacy, dialogue and negotiated arrangements as the basis for pursuing Ethiopia’s interests while promoting stability and cooperation in the wider Horn of Africa and Red Sea region.

Addis Ababa, September 17, 2026 (ENA) —The Eritrean regime is seeking to internationalize the conflict in the region by using the TPLF and other armed groups, said Getachew Reda, Minister and Advisor to the Ethiopian Prime Minister on East African Affairs. Speaking to Pulse of Africa, Getachew, who was also the former President of the Tigray Interim Regional Administration said: “The effort to internationalize the conflict is being done by Eritrea….” According to the advisor, the regime in Asmara is also exerting a maximum efforts to widen the conflict by involving armed groups and encouraging the deployment of young people beyond Ethiopia’s borders. He said reports that some had been captured, killed or wounded were deeply concerning. Getachew further revealed that former adversaries had set aside their differences in pursuit of a common objective, warning that such alliances could ultimately deepen instability across the Horn of Africa. He described the alignment between the defunct Tigray People’s Liberation Front and Eritrea as a marriage of convenience between “strange bedfellows” who cannot agree on major issues, calling it a prescription for disaster. Getachew said “I don't lose sleep over that particular issue,” referring to the alliance. But he warned that an alliance of “strange bedfellows” whose members disagree on major issues could ultimately become a “prescription for disaster.” Politics is often called “the art of the possible.” Yet the latest alignment, Getachew Reda argued, shows that political interests can unite even former foes—proving, in this case, that politics can also be the art of the impossible. He noted that the TPLF had been given “marching orders” to provoke clashes with federal forces and link up with armed groups in Amhara region. Getachew further stated that the Eritrean government seeking to keep Ethiopia unstable by coordinating with different groups opposed to the federal government. He further alleged that Eritrea enjoys support from Egypt in these efforts. “President Isaias has support in this endeavor from the likes of Egypt. We know for a fact,” Getachew underscored. “The federal government has exercised maximum restraint so far, despite provocations here and there,” he said, adding that the government had largely pursued a containment strategy. He cautioned, however, that the situation could change if armed groups-initiated attacks, potentially turning a localized confrontation into a broader regional conflict. The advisor stressed the need for the international community to exert pressure on the Eritrean regime and other actors he described as spoilers of peace to prevent another devastating war in the region.

Addis Ababa, September 17, 2026 (ENA) —Ethiopia and Comoros enjoy strong diplomatic relations and wish to strengthen their cooperation in several areas, the Comoros’ ambassador to Ethiopia has said. The two countries have established cooperative relations that have gradually grown stronger. The Comoros opened its embassy in Ethiopia in 2011, and both sides are currently working to finalize an agreement on the establishment of a joint commission. In an exclusive interview, the Comoros’ Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the African Union, Mr. Youssouf Mondoha Assoumani, said the commission should help identify new areas of cooperation, particularly in trade, health, education, culture, tourism, and civil aviation. Economic cooperation is also a key priority. The air connectivity provided by Ethiopian Airlines facilitates trade between the two countries and helps increase travel by Comorian and Ethiopian citizens and business operators. The Comoros is preparing to celebrate the 10th anniversary of Ethiopian Airlines’ service to the country, and a delegation from the airline is expected to visit the Comoros for the occasion. The ambassador also highlighted the potential for expanding trade, noting that Comorian businesses could strengthen their ties with their Ethiopian counterparts, particularly through the chambers of commerce in both countries. Cooperation also extends to the security sector. A Comorian police delegation recently visited Ethiopia to learn about Ethiopia’s experience in security, the fight against organized crime, and drug trafficking. In civil aviation, cooperation on air traffic controller training is also under way with Ethiopian institutions. The training program, scheduled to last several years, aims to strengthen Comorian national capabilities in this sector. Ambassador Youssouf also emphasized the importance of the energy sector for Africa’s development, commending Ethiopia’s efforts to expand its energy capacity and its potential to help provide access to electricity in the region. He also commended Ethiopia’s national dialogue initiative, noting that peace and stability are essential conditions for the development of the African continent. Finally, the Comoros hopes to draw on Ethiopia’s expertise in tourism, the hospitality industry, and the organization of sporting events. In particular, the Comoros will host the upcoming Indian Ocean Islands Games, for which cooperation with Ethiopian partners is being considered. The ambassador reaffirmed the Comoros’ commitment to continuing to strengthen relations with Ethiopia, particularly through the future joint commission, which should help identify areas of mutual interest and bring new cooperation projects to fruition.

Addis Ababa, September 17, 2026 (ENA) —Ministers and senior government officials from IGAD Member States have endorsed the IGAD Regional Agrifood Systems Investment Plan (RASIP) 2026–2035 and the IGAD Regional Seed Policy Framework 2026. The decision marks a major step toward coordinated investment, policy harmonization, and the transformation of agrifood systems across the region. Speaking at the ministerial meeting in Addis Ababa on Thursday, IGAD Executive Secretary Workneh Gebeyehu said the two frameworks would provide a foundation for aligning national priorities, mobilizing investment and strengthening cross border cooperation among member states. He said RASIP is intended to guide investment in resilient and sustainable food systems, promote regional agricultural trade and translate continental commitments into coordinated regional and national action. Workneh also emphasized the role of the IGAD Regional Seed Policy Framework 2026 in harmonizing seed systems and facilitating the cross-border movement of quality and climate resilient crop varieties. The framework seeks to reduce regulatory barriers, align seed standards and facilitate regional trade in certified seeds. It is also expected to expand farmers’ access to climate smart and high yielding varieties while ensuring that traded seeds comply with quality, safety and disease prevention requirements. The IGAD executive secretary said the endorsement of the two frameworks demonstrates regional solidarity and a shared commitment to move from policy dialogue toward implementation, coordinated investment and greater accountability. “Resilient seeds are one of the most effective tools to combat climate shocks and improve yields,” he said, stressing the importance of coordinated regional action to strengthen food security. Workneh said stronger agricultural systems could help IGAD member states reduce their reliance on recurrent emergency food responses by increasing agricultural production, improving rural livelihoods and expanding opportunities to participate in continental markets. He also used the meeting to highlight the humanitarian and security situation in the region, calling for an end to the conflict in Sudan and increased humanitarian assistance to populations affected by the war. Speaking on behalf of Ethiopia’s Ministry of Agriculture, Senior Advisor Getachew Deriba reaffirmed Ethiopia’s support for the regional agrifood transformation agenda. He described food security as a critical priority for the highly interconnected IGAD region and said Ethiopia was integrating regional objectives into its national agricultural development framework. The endorsement of RASIP 2026–2035 and the Regional Seed Policy Framework 2026 is expected to strengthen cooperation among IGAD Member States in investment planning, seed production, quality assurance, regulation and agricultural trade, while supporting efforts to build more productive and climate resilient food systems across the region.

Addis Ababa, September 17, 2026 (ENA) — The Egyptian political instrumentalization of the Nile and the portrayal of Nile Basin countries as a stereotype have fostered negative public perceptions in Egypt toward basin countries in general, and Ethiopia in particular, a senior researcher at the Center for Strategic Studies and Integration Initiative, Abdushakur Abdussamad, told ENA. “This portrayal, instrumentalization, intense media use, and heavy media campaigns are ultimately more harmful to the Egyptian public than they are effective,” Abdushakur said. He explained that the Egyptian public has been conditioned to believe that the Nile is Egypt’s sole source of water for meeting its needs. “This implies that any development project undertaken by another country on the Nile would come at the expense of the Egyptian people’s water share, deeply ingraining this concept in the Egyptian public’s psyche.” The senior researcher noted that this framing serves, to a large extent, a media purpose designed to distract from domestic social, political, and economic issues within Egypt. “In turn, this promotes a significantly biased and stereotypical image of other Nile Basin countries. As a result, generations raised on this narrative accept it as absolute fact, whereas the true reality that needs to be projected is that this water source is shared, not the exclusive property of Egypt,” he explained. Abdushakur said the issue was thus diverted from an integrative developmental project into a politically exploited initiative. The senior researcher pointed out that Egypt possesses numerous other water resources. It is bordered by the Mediterranean Sea to the north and the Red Sea to the east, and it also has groundwater reserves. “However, driven by a desire for a cost-free resource that requires no additional financial burden, our Egyptian brothers focus on the Nile and seek to retain a veto over its utilization.” Further elaborating on the Nile, the senior researcher said the Nile Basin Cooperative Framework Agreement (CFA), also known as the Entebbe Agreement, has confirmed that everyone has the right to benefit from Nile waters. He noted that the legally binding international agreement now serves as the framework regulating relations among Nile Basin countries. “Consequently, Ethiopia has every right to benefit and has never needed permission, as has been reaffirmed over the past decades, to pursue its legitimate right to meet its development needs, particularly in the field of hydropower,” Abdushakur stressed. He said it should be clear that Ethiopia does not need to ask anyone’s permission, since hydropower is a renewable, safe and clean source of electricity. He added that the country is therefore “responsibly fulfilling its role without harming anyone — a principle Ethiopia emphasizes and which has been proven correct, as the Ethiopian position is sound and has caused no harm to any party.” He underscored that the current and former Ethiopian water ministers have stated that Ethiopia’s utilization of the Nile waters — and all its water resources in rivers that feed neighboring countries — is an inherent right. “Just imagine a country that supplies over 86 percent of the Blue Nile’s waters being barred from utilizing this vital resource. This is both an injustice and a significant bias.” The senior researcher said Ethiopia, from the very beginning, invited downstream and transit countries to negotiate regarding the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), going even further by proposing a partnership in financing, construction and operation. “Unfortunately, this invitation was not received in a manner befitting partners of a shared destiny.” Abdushakur added that the issue was diverted from an integrative developmental project into a politically exploited initiative. “But political instrumentalization is short-lived, although the rift it creates in public sentiment can be difficult to overcome in the near term.”

Addis Ababa, September 17, 2026 (ENA) —TheEthiopia’s quest for sovereign access to the Red Sea has been witnessing growing consensus, Chief of Staff and Senior Researcher of the Horn of Africa at IFA, Gizachew Asrat, said. In an exclusive interview with ENA, Gizachew said Ethiopia’s quest for sea access is gaining momentum as a great asset for the Red Sea region. He noted that “there is a great consensus on Ethiopia’s access to the sea or presence in the sea issues.” Today, Ethiopia’s access to the sea is increasingly viewed as a legitimate strategic right, driven by its growing population and economy, expanding import-export trade, and pressing national and regional security interests. The country’s geographical proximity to the Red Sea, together with its historical links to the region’s ports, has remained central to its argument for pursuing a sustainable maritime outlet.   Ethiopia historically administered the ports of Massawa and Assab and maintained naval capabilities before Eritrea’s separation. The Senior Researcher further stated that there is a common understanding that Ethiopia should be around the sea and should also play a great role in the sea in terms of economy and security. He emphasized the significance of advancing on trust-building and cooperation between neighboring countries, and the global community. The researcher, particularly stressed the need for understanding the real intent of Ethiopia's quest for access to the sea. “The geopolitical, geo-economic, technology and energy, and everything are interconnected and interlinked between the maritime, the sea and the land,” he said. Gizachew elaborated that the interconnected nature of regional challenges requires countries to focus on common threats and interests rather than treating maritime and land-based security as separate issues. In this regard, Ethiopia's return to reliable sea access is vital for peace, regional integration and collective security of the Horn of Africa and beyond, he asserted. “Engaging Ethiopia on the Red Sea platform is an asset for the region,” Gizachew said, emphasizing the importance of regional cooperation and partnership. Maritime security should also be examined from wider geopolitical and geo-economic perspectives, particularly given the strategic importance of global waterways and the competition surrounding them. Gizachew further emphasized that Ethiopia is part of the global economic and security system and therefore needs to remain engaged in issues affecting the Red Sea and international maritime routes.   “We are part of the globe and we have to be engaged there and definitely Ethiopia should have to be around the sea or on the sea,” he said. He underscored the importance of working closely with regional states and institutions, noting that Ethiopia's return to the sea will be instrumental not only for its national interest but also crucial for ensuring regional stability. Having a huge population, a growing economy, and a strategic location, the return of Ethiopia’s access to the sea is a vital geopolitical imperative for securing maritime security in the Horn of Africa and the wider Red Sea corridor, the senior researcher stressed. As the world’s most populous landlocked nation, the country’s strategic push to reconnect with the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden corridors represents a foundational pillar for both its domestic survival and the broader geopolitical integration.

Addis Ababa, September 16, 2026 (ENA) —The 70th General Conference of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), bringing together representatives of 181 member states, including Ethiopia, is underway in Vienna, with member states discussing nuclear safety and security, technology applications and the peaceful uses of nuclear science. The annual General Conference serves as the IAEA’s principal policymaking forum, where representatives of member states review the Agency’s activities, consider key issues in the nuclear field and set priorities for its work. Since the IAEA was founded in 1957, the conference has provided a global platform for advancing the peaceful applications of nuclear technology across areas ranging from energy production and cancer care to food security, water management, nuclear safety and security, and safeguards. Decisions adopted during the conference help shape the Agency’s programme of work for the year ahead, ensuring that its activities respond to emerging global needs and development priorities.   Opening the conference, IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi highlighted the Agency’s achievements over the past year and their positive impacts, underscoring the growing role of nuclear science and technology in addressing development and humanitarian challenges. The conference also features a scientific forum focused on expanding access to cancer treatment services, as well as side events and exhibitions highlighting advances and practical applications of nuclear science and technology. Delegates are further deliberating on measures to strengthen nuclear safety and security and expand the peaceful application of nuclear technology.   The agenda includes consideration of the IAEA’s 2025 Annual Report, an update to the Agency’s 2027 budget, financial reports and the election of members to the IAEA Board of Governors. Representing Ethiopia at the high-level conference are Ambassador Haileselassie Subba, Deputy Permanent Representative Permanent Mission Geneva and Second Secretary Betelhem Mekonnen, who are leading the Ethiopian delegation. The 70th General Conference comes as countries continue to explore how nuclear science and technology can contribute to global priorities, including energy, health, food security, environmental management and sustainable development.

Addis Ababa, September 16, 2026 (ENA) —The Ethio-Israel cooperation across agriculture, health, technology, water, energy, investment and other sectors reflects the broadening of the bilateral relationship between the two countries, according to Ambassador Avraham Neguise. In an exclusive interview with ENA, Israel's Ambassador Neguise noted that the relationship between the two countries has deep historical roots and has evolved into a broad modern partnership covering government-to-government cooperation, investment, technology and capacity building. “Ethiopia and Israel have a unique relationship rooted in ancient times that has brought us to the present bilateral relationship,” he said. According to him, the Israeli Embassy in Addis Ababa is working in several areas to strengthen and expand the longstanding relationship between the countries. Agriculture is among the key areas of Ethiopia-Israel cooperation, with Israeli investors establishing companies in Ethiopia and introducing Israeli agricultural technologies and expertise. The Ambassador pointed to agricultural investments in Bishoftu where Israeli companies are producing fruits and vegetables. “Cooperation and investment in the sector have contributed to Ethiopia’s growing exports of agricultural products, including avocados, to international markets such as Europe and China,” Ambassador Neguise said. Furthermore, he pointed out that Ethiopia’s macroeconomic reforms are creating a more favorable environment for foreign investors, including Israeli companies. “The macroeconomic policy is a very important policy because it invites foreign investors, and among the foreign investors are Israelis.” Ambassador Neguise said the reforms are making it easier for investors to establish businesses and explore opportunities in Ethiopia. Ethiopia’s natural resources, including its mining potential, are areas that could attract further Israeli investment, he stated, adding that Israeli companies are already engaged in mining activities involving different minerals, including gold. “Ethiopia is now liberalized in its economy, reformed in its legal system, and technology and innovation are very helpful to run businesses and to invest in Ethiopia,” he elaborated. Health is the other area in which the two countries are expanding cooperation, Ambassador Neguise added, stating that Israeli doctors have been working with Ethiopian medical professionals through workshops and other capacity-building programs, while Ethiopian doctors have also traveled to Israel to participate in educational seminars. The cooperation focuses on sharing Israeli health-service technologies, innovation and expertise to contribute to the development of Ethiopia’s health system. In addition, the Ambassador highlighted cooperation in innovation and technology, particularly in cybersecurity. “As Ethiopia is marching to the digital system, the challenge of cybersecurity always exists,” he noted, stating that Israel is sharing its experience in addressing cybersecurity challenges. Water management and renewable energy are also emerging areas of cooperation, according to Ambassador Neguise. He recalled the memorandum of understanding signed on areas including efficient water use, technological monitoring of water resources and irrigation development. He further cited cooperation between Israeli experts and Ethiopian Investment Holdings in strengthening the ecosystem for startups and entrepreneurs, including initiatives aimed at encouraging job creation and entrepreneurship. The two countries are also cooperating in preventing crime through relations with the Federal Police, it was learned.

Addis Ababa, September 16, 2026 (ENA) —Egypt must align its Nile strategy with the realities of the 21st century, former Ethiopia's House of People's Representatives Speaker Teshome Toga said, stressing that outdated colonial-era notions can no longer guide the management of a shared transboundary river. In his analytical article, the former Speaker noted that the Nile Basin has been transformed by population growth, climate change, rising energy demand, food insecurity and rapid economic development, requiring a new framework based on cooperation, equity and mutual respect. Therefore, “the Nile must be managed according to the realities of the twenty-first century, not the logic of a bygone colonial era”. The Blue Nile Abay River, which originates in the Ethiopian highlands, contributes about 86 percent of the Nile’s annual flow, underscoring Ethiopia’s central role in the basin. The former Speaker stressed that Egypt’s dependence on the Nile does not give it monopoly over the river, saying a shared international watercourse must be governed through fairness and mutual recognition of the rights of all riparian states. “Dependence on the Nile does not confer monopoly over a shared river,” he wrote. Teshome criticized the continued reliance on colonial-era and exclusionary agreements, including the 1959 bilateral arrangement between Egypt and Sudan, which allocated the river’s waters without the participation of upstream countries, including Ethiopia. Such arrangements cannot provide a sustainable basis for managing a shared resource in the modern era, he added. Teshome described the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) as a clear manifestation of Ethiopia’s new reality and its growing ability to mobilize domestic resources for national development. He noted that the dam reflects Ethiopia’s resolve to expand electricity access, reduce poverty and accelerate economic transformation through self-reliance. “The GERD has demonstrated Ethiopia’s resolve, self-reliance, and ability to build for its future with its own resources.” Teshome stated that attempts to block Ethiopia’s development projects through external financing restrictions, political pressure or vetoes would not succeed. “No veto, no pressure, and no external interference can stop Ethiopia’s march toward development.” Moreover, the former Speaker and diplomat rejected military confrontation as a solution to Nile disputes, saying no military strategy can ensure sustainable water security. “Military confrontation cannot resolve the Nile question; only dialogue can,” he underscored. He further underlined Ethiopia’s long-standing commitment to diplomacy and cooperation, citing the 2015 Declaration of Principles on the GERD as an important example of peaceful engagement with Egypt and Sudan. The former Speaker called for genuine negotiations founded on sovereign equality, equitable and reasonable utilization, mutual respect, scientific cooperation and the peaceful settlement of disputes. “The Nile should be a bridge of cooperation, not a permanent source of tension,” he pointed out. No country should monopolize a shared river and no nation should be denied its legitimate right to development, he added. In conclusion, Teshome noted that the future of the Nile must be built on shared responsibility, shared prosperity and a political understanding that reflects the realities of the 21st century.

Addis Ababa, September 16, 2026 (ENA) — The Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) has called for coordinated and large-scale investment to strengthen food systems resilience across the Horn of Africa. The call was made at the opening of IGAD Final Expert Validation and Ministerial Endorsement of the IGAD Regional Agrifood Systems Investment Plan (RASIP) 2026–2035 that opened today. Speaking on the occasion, IGAD Food Systems Resilience Programme Project Coordinator Senait Regassa said the IGAD Regional Agrifood Systems Investment Plan (RASIP) 2026–2035 is designed to translate continental and regional commitments into practical action. According to her, the regional agrifood systems investment plan links agriculture, environment, trade, and resilience into a coherent framework for food security, economic growth, and social stability. She noted that food insecurity in the IGAD region is being driven by multiple and interconnected challenges, including climate shocks, conflicts, economic volatility and structural weaknesses in food systems. The RASIP 2026–2035 seeks to take a more integrated approach to food systems by linking sustainable agricultural production with trade, investment, nutrition, climate resilience, governance and research. The meeting is also considering the IGAD Regional Seed Policy and Regulatory Framework, which is intended to strengthen regional cooperation on seed systems and improve access to quality seed varieties adapted to climate and pest-related challenges. The framework is expected to promote cooperation among governments, farmers, private-sector actors and technical and development partners, contributing to increased agricultural productivity and food security across the region. Minister of Agriculture Advisor, Zena Habtewold, said the regional investment plan comes at a critical time as countries in the region continue to face food insecurity amid recurrent droughts, floods and other pressures. “The regional agricultural system investment plan comes at a pivotal moment, aligning with the Kampala Declaration strategy and action plan,” he added. He highlighted the potential of the region's agricultural resources and young population, stressing the need to translate these assets into practical investments and improved livelihoods. The Advisor pointed to Ethiopia's experience in areas including irrigated wheat production, improved seed varieties and cluster farming as examples of efforts to strengthen food and nutrition security. Ethiopia's Green Legacy Initiative, which combines landscape restoration, agroforestry, soil conservation and fruit-tree development, also demonstrates how agricultural productivity and environmental restoration can be pursued together. During the three-day session, participants will review the investment priorities, results framework and implementation arrangements of RASIP 2026–2035 before its ministerial endorsement. The meeting has brought together experts, policymakers, representatives of IGAD member states and development partners to review regional priorities and strengthen policy and investment frameworks for more resilient agrifood systems. It forms part of IGAD's broader efforts to strengthen regional food systems resilience, improve preparedness for shocks and promote coordinated investment and policy action among member states.